Full Forecaste

Home > Breaking News

Notorious Oregon child killer Diane Downs up for parole

Wednesday, December 3, 2008 9:24 AM PST

By The Associated Press

Font Size:

SALEM, Ore. — Twenty-five years later, Diane Downs still insists that she is innocent of shooting her children, one fatally, in a crime that riveted Oregonians and was recounted in an Ann Rule book and a TV movie starring Farrah Fawcett.

Next Tuesday, she comes up for a parole hearing. Anticipating a crowd of reporters and others, the parole board has moved its hearing to a community college studio.

Downs, now 53, was convicted in 1984. Suspicion turned to her shortly after she arrived at a Springfield hospital, her three children wounded and a bullet in her left arm, shouting, “Somebody just shot my kids!”

The prosecution said Downs shot them because she hoped to free herself to rekindle a romance with a married Arizona man.

Key testimony came from her oldest daughter, Christie Ann, who was 8 when shot. A 7-year-old daughter, Cheryl, died from her wounds and Downs’ 3-year-old son, Daniel, was paralyzed.

Sobbing at times, Christie Ann testified that her mother took a gun out of the trunk of the parked car and opened fire.

Oregonians were shocked and captivated by the horrific story through a six-week trial, at which Downs claimed that a man shot the children.

“Over the years, I have told you and the rest of the world that a man shot me and my children. I have never changed my story,” she wrote in her parole application.

Prosecutors scoff and point to her varying stories: A “bushy-haired stranger” flagged down her car and shot her and the children. Or the shootings were done by two men wearing ski masks. Or the shootings were the doings of drug dealers and corrupt law enforcement officials.

“Downs continues to fail to demonstrate any honest insight into her criminal behavior,” Lane County District Attorney Douglass Harcleroad wrote the parole board. “... Even after her convictions, she continues to fabricate new versions of events under which the crimes occurred.”

Her chief prosecutor at the time, Fred Hugi, is now retired. He adopted the surviving children, who are reported to have productive adult lives.

Harcleroad said Danny remains paralyzed from the chest down and “will be confined to a wheelchair for the rest of his life. Christie has permanent partial paralysis on one side of her body.”

After the trial, Ann Rule had a best-seller with “Small Sacrifices,” and Farrah Fawcett played Downs in a made-for-TV movie.

Downs had 10 days of freedom when she escaped in 1987, scaling a Salem prison fence in broad daylight at a time when the prison was short of staff.

After capturing her, Oregon officials sent her out of state. At the hearing, she will testify from the Valley State Prison for Women in Chowchilla, Calif.

In prison, Downs got an associate’s college degree in general studies but says she has had nothing to gain from prison programs or self-help groups since being transferred to the California prison system in 1993.

“I don’t run drugs or brew hooch,” she wrote the parole board. “... In 25 years behind these steel bars, I have NOT cracked one of these ’ladies’ in the head and if you had lived inside this place you might understand what an accomplishment that is.”

Before Oregon voters in 1994 approved mandatory minimum sentences for major crimes, prisoners were eligible for early release. There are still hundreds of prisoners like Downs eligible for such consideration because their crimes predate Measure 11.

At the hearing Downs will not be allowed to give a statement. Instead, she will respond to questions posed by the three members of the parole board.

Prosecutors and victims, or their representatives, can be heard in person, by phone or in writing.

After the testimony, the board will deliberate in private and announce its decision, expected on the same day. It rarely grants such requests.

If Downs’ parole is denied, her next chance for reconsideration will be in two years. If she ever is granted parole, her release will be delayed 14 months for the extra sentence she received for her 1987 escape.

 

Previous Next

Gondolapete wrote on Dec 3, 2008 10:37 AM:

" This women is the epitome of pure evil..Imagine what must have been going through the minds of her kids...this women should have been executed.. "

gabby wrote on Dec 3, 2008 11:08 AM:

" I pray they do not let her out...after what she did she should sit behind bars for the rest of her life "

TheGenius wrote on Dec 3, 2008 11:19 AM:

" There is no way this woman should ever be let out of prison. I know one of the victims, and there is no way in hell any of the victims should see this woman gain her freedom. Let her rot in prison. "

Boo Khaki wrote on Dec 3, 2008 11:36 AM:

" What a sick and twisted individual. She is exactly where she belongs---rotting in prison. "

TDN Bad Boy wrote on Dec 3, 2008 11:58 AM:

" This is a perfect example of why the death penalty is necessary. Keep spending good money Oregon on this piece of garbage. She should have been in the ground in 1984. This is what the Liberals give to society when they fight the death penalty. "

stink wrote on Dec 3, 2008 12:01 PM:

" Ditto +1 "

lngconnn wrote on Dec 3, 2008 12:35 PM:

" I hope she stays in prison. The fact that one of her children testified against her should be proof enough that she did it and needs to stay behind bars. Children don't lie about that kind of stuff...even if they don't say anything. I remember in the movie it showed her coming in to see one of her kids at the hospital and the child wet their pants. "

Gramma cc wrote on Dec 3, 2008 1:22 PM:

" As I said in yesterdays article....the fact that she still denies what she did just means that she has not changed..I also don't think this evil creature has a remorseful bone in her body...Letting her out would be crazy...I also agree that she is one that should have definatley recieved the death penalty.. "

Top Jobs
Top Garage Sales
Top Rentals