Anger over gay marriage vote directed at Mormons
Friday, November 14, 2008 11:44 PM PST
By Eric Gorski
The Associated Press
Supporters of gay marriage, frustrated over a ballot-box defeat in California, have channeled much of their anger toward the towering white spires of Mormon temples.
For months, the Mormon church sought to portray itself as just one member of a coalition of Catholics, evangelicals, black Protestants and others supporting Proposition 8, a measure to stop gay marriage in California.
Some opponents of the measure sought to dispel that in the campaign’s final weeks, pointing to extensive Mormon organizing and the staggering amount of money donated by individual Mormons at the behest of church leaders in Salt Lake City.
Since the measure’s passage last week, media outlets reported chants of “Mormon scum” and slurs against church founder Joseph Smith at a demonstration outside a Los Angeles-area temple, and a church meeting-house was vandalized. More Mormon-specific protests are in the works.
The backlash against Mormons has ignited a debate over whether the church deserves to be singled out for what opponents believe was a dishonest campaign or is an easy political target as a minority religion that has taken plenty of lumps.
“I think it is a purely tactical reaction from those who are supporting gay marriage because if it can be made to appear the opposition is essentially one religion that is, frankly, an often misunderstood religion, it’s easier to make the case that the other side is reasonable,” said Michael Otterson, spokesman for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, or the Mormon church.
Proposition 8 opponents denounced vandalism and violence, and some have spoken out against anti-Mormon rhetoric. But they also say Mormon money funded irresponsible ads, like one suggesting young children would be required to learn about homosexuality in schools.
“I don’t think the Mormon church stepped outside the boundaries available to any faith community that wants to get organized on values they hold dear,” said Lindi Ramsden, a Unitarian minister who organized interfaith opposition to the measure. “The part that saddens me is that money donated by people of faith was used to finance advertising that is as close to blatant lies as you can get.”
Even so, Ramsden sent an e-mail to allies this week warning against making scapegoats of any one group, including Mormons and blacks, who also strongly backed the measure.
The Mormon church’s Proposition 8 efforts represent its strongest push into politics since it opposed the Equal Right Amendment in the 1970s.
The church believes traditional marriage is best for society. Heterosexual marriage is also central to Mormon theology; Mormons believe their marriages are keys to eternal life.
In June, the LDS First Presidency, its highest governing body, announced its support for Proposition 8 in a letter read at every congregation. Members were asked to donate their “means and time” to the effort to undo a May court decision that legalized gay marriage in California and opened the door for 18,000 same-gender couples to wed in the past four months.
One factor in Mormons becoming an opposition target was Mormonsfor8.com, a Web site founded by Nadine Hansen, a 61-year-old semiretired lawyer from Cedar City, Utah.
Because the church itself did not donate money to the campaign, Hansen sought to identify Mormon donors of $1,000 or more, matching campaign records to tips from site visitors and church members and what she and others uncovered with search engines.
The site attributes $15 million in donations to Mormons, or nearly half the Yes on 8 war chest in a state where Mormons make up 2 percent of the population.
Originally, the site named Mormon givers, but Hansen said she changed it to include only first names and last-name initials over concerns Mormons would be hate-crime targets.
“For months, these sacred houses of worship were the precinct offices, members were called to be campaign workers and ward lists were turned into voter rosters,” Hansen said. “Basically, if the church wants to know why Mormon sacred places are targeted, look in the mirror.”
Hansen said she is a Mormon but does not attend church. Otterson, the church spokesman, said the church recognizes freedom to demonstrate, but hopes it is in “good taste and respectful.”
Some gay marriage backers in California began taking a sharper tone against Mormons in October. The liberal group Courage Campaign organized an online petition asking LDS Church President Thomas Monson to stop bearing false witness, among other things.
On Election Night, the group aired a controversial ad that depicted Mormon missionaries ransacking a lesbian couple’s house and destroying their marriage certificate.
“All it did was dramatize what the church wanted to do and in fact did do,” said Rick Jacobs, chairman of the Courage Campaign. He said religious bigotry was not at work.
“There is no place in America for anything but an embrace — not just tolerance — of people’s religious beliefs,” Jacobs said. “Equally, I would say great caution should be exercised when people try to restrict people’s rights.”
Dale Carpenter, a University of Minnesota law professor who opposed Proposition 8, said singling out the Mormon church is wrong. He called it “selective indignation,” and said some Mormons publicly opposed the measure and others backed it for deeply held beliefs, not bigotry.
“It’s especially inappropriate to target the physical buildings — the places of worship themselves — because that invites the kind of religious intolerance we have suffered too much of in the history of this country,” Carpenter said.
Roman Catholic Bishop William Weigand of Sacramento also defended Mormons, calling the backlash “serious religious bigotry.”
Gay-marriage backers “look at this whole thing as a discrimination issue. And they’re giving the same, in a sense, to Mormons and other religious people,” Weigand said in an interview.
Protests also have been staged at a Catholic cathedral and an Orange County megachurch led by pastor and best-selling author Rick Warren, who endorsed Proposition 8.
But if anything, gay-rights activists are intensifying their focus on the Mormon church. Building on protests at LDS temples in California and Salt Lake City in the past week, they went on to plan a demonstration Wednesday night at the church’s temple in Manhattan.
Gay rights activists have proposed tourism boycotts in Utah and challenges to the church’s tax exempt status. For every $5 the Los Angeles Gay and Lesbian Center raises to fight the gay-marriage ban, the group promises to send a postcard to Monson, the church president.
“They weren’t the only conservative sort of extremist anti-gay religious group that got involved in the campaign,” said Lorri L. Jean, the center’s chief executive officer. “But nobody did what they did.”
Some Mormon scholars believe more is at work than anger against Mormons flexing financial and organizational muscle. Armand Mauss, a retired Washington State University sociologist, said the campaign laid bare a “latent anti-Mormon undercurrent.”
Anti-Mormon rhetoric is politically safe because Mormons remain a relatively small minority and “have never been completely assimilated as ’normal Americans’ to completely live down the image of ’weirdness’ inherited from the 19th century,” Mauss said in an e-mail.
The evangelical mantra that Mormons aren’t Christian — as well as this year’s raid in Texas of a polygamist sect, a group not always distinguished from mainstream Mormonism — feeds into that, he said.
Richard Davis, a political science professor at church-owned Brigham Young University, said intolerance of Mormons extends from the secular left to the religious right. Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney’s Mormonism was attacked by some evangelicals — Mormon allies on Proposition 8.
“That’s where the LDS church is right now,” Davis said, “despite years of efforts to improve the image of the church.”
Just MY Opinion! wrote on Nov 15, 2008 10:44 AM:
JMKelso wrote on Nov 15, 2008 11:27 AM:
Well said!
Guess what? The ban went up for vote and the people voted it down. Stop whining about it people.
Marriage = 1 man + 1 woman,
always has, and I hope it always will!!! "
Jason L. Cheung wrote on Nov 15, 2008 1:41 PM:
DON'T HAVE ONE.
"That is what is wrong with America now the ideas of few are getting pressed on the views of many. If you don't agree than it's bigotry!"
I seem to remember learning in civics class that yes, there was Majority Rule, but there are also Minority Rights. Besides, let's not forget that there is a seperation of Church and State in this country for a reason. "
LongviewFam wrote on Nov 15, 2008 4:50 PM:
Hauskapoika wrote on Nov 15, 2008 6:06 PM:
Gays should be mad at theirself for all the marching and protesting. They need to understand that the term "MARRIAGE" has bee defined and used exclusively -for centuries - by men and women who marry. It is the definition and term - not hate or legal aspects. Get wise, gays, you invented a different term for homosexuality, so invent a different term for gay unions, and I think such a proposition would pass. "
muse wrote on Nov 15, 2008 6:25 PM:
ThereGoesThatTriptoHawaii wrote on Nov 16, 2008 1:52 AM:
Jason L. Cheung wrote on Nov 16, 2008 2:41 AM:
Huh. An estimated 6,000 people marched in Seattle and I have not heard of one arrest. There is a term for violence against Gay people (by straight people)due to their sexual orientation, (Gaybashing) yet there isn't one for violence against Straight people by Gay people.
Or, Muse, is there one that I've not heard of? "
grrrowl wrote on Nov 16, 2008 7:00 AM:
longviewrez wrote on Nov 16, 2008 9:39 AM:
cheney119 wrote on Nov 16, 2008 12:11 PM:
tallsy wrote on Nov 16, 2008 12:30 PM:
El Gabilon wrote on Nov 16, 2008 1:08 PM:
golfer wrote on Nov 16, 2008 1:47 PM:
LongviewFam wrote on Nov 16, 2008 4:09 PM:
jinxy wrote on Nov 16, 2008 4:30 PM:
TK wrote on Nov 16, 2008 4:39 PM:
vikingtwin5 wrote on Nov 16, 2008 5:16 PM:
golfer wrote on Nov 16, 2008 5:20 PM:
cheney119 wrote on Nov 16, 2008 5:45 PM:
LongviewFam wrote on Nov 16, 2008 7:44 PM:
JD Hogg wrote on Nov 16, 2008 9:05 PM:
As for the idea of gay marriage, it's preposterous. Marriage is an ANCIENT religious covenant with GOD between 1 man and 1 woman for the purpose of procreation and raising a family. The idea of gay marriage is an insult to this original covenant. So until the heavens open up and God comes down and gives homosexuals the ability to reproduce, Marriage will stay the same, and Religions world-wide will defend it. I'm personally ok with giving gays the same rights that married couples have in regards to taxes, inheritance, insurance, etc etc...via a Civil Union, but will NEVER be ok with the idea of Gay Marriage...it will never happen. "
tired wrote on Nov 16, 2008 9:44 PM:
dude wrote on Nov 16, 2008 9:47 PM:
grrrowl wrote on Nov 17, 2008 5:32 AM:
mom of four wrote on Nov 17, 2008 8:38 AM:
spete98611 wrote on Nov 17, 2008 9:32 AM:
Realist wrote on Nov 17, 2008 11:31 AM:
Hauskapoika wrote on Nov 17, 2008 6:55 PM:
bluE wrote on Nov 17, 2008 7:38 PM:
Muse wrote on Nov 17, 2008 10:43 PM:
mybaby1952 wrote on Nov 17, 2008 10:58 PM:
muse wrote on Nov 18, 2008 10:13 PM:







Printable version
E-mail this article

Past Month's Most Commented Stories