Full Forecaste

Home > Election

State moves to implement assisted suicide law

Saturday, November 8, 2008 10:21 AM PST

By Rachel La Corte
The Associated Press

Font Size:

OLYMPIA — Washington state officials have four months to set up a new voter-approved law allowing doctors to prescribe lethal medication to terminally ill patients.

Washington is now the second state in the nation to have such a law, and officials may look to neighboring Oregon for a blueprint.

The measure takes effect March 4. Officials at the attorney general's office and the state Department of Health said they have just started to go through the language of the measure, which passed Tuesday.

Department of Health spokesman Tim Church said it won't have to create a new office or section within the agency. Under the measure, any health care provider writing a prescription or dispensing medication must file a copy of the record with the Health Department, which is required to create an annual statistical report on how the law is used.

Church said questions about other responsibilities the department might have will be determined during the rule-making process, which hasn't started yet.

"We're going to be gathering information over the next few weeks and expect to start the rule-making process by the end of this month," he said.

Anne Martens, spokeswoman for the coalition that supported the measure, said the parties with an interest in the measure likely will study how Oregon's law was put into effect "and see if we can take that experience and make implementation as easy as possible here."

"I don't anticipate any legislative tinkering, but you can never rule that out," she said. "The law as written is identical to the law that's been working in Oregon. We don't see any need to change any part of it."

Opponents said they don't plan to be at the table to help with the process.

"We do not concede that Initiative 1000 is a law in this state," said Eileen Geller, campaign coordinator for the opposition. "Right now for us every option is on the table. Legal is one of them."

Any legal challenge could be difficult since the Washington law mirrors Oregon's law, which was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Under the new Washington law, any patient requesting fatal medication must be at least 18, declared competent and a resident of Washington state.

The patient would have to make two oral requests, 15 days apart, and submit a written request witnessed by two people. One of the witnesses must not be a relative, heir, attending doctor, or connected with a health facility where the requester lives.

Two doctors also would have to certify that the patient has a terminal condition and six months or less to live.

Jennifer Hanscom, spokeswoman for the Washington State Medical Association, which opposed the measure, said the organization has already started educating its more than 9,600 physicians about the new law. Information is on the group's Web site, and a newsletter was being sent to members.

"We respect the wishes of the public and the public has made their wishes known," she said.

She said it will be looking closely at the initiative language to see if there's room for improvements, but "we are not actively seeking any changes."

Under the measure, physicians and pharmacists are not required to write or fill lethal prescriptions if they are opposed to the law.

Since Oregon's law took effect in 1997, more than 340 people — mostly ailing with cancer — have used it to end their lives.

Previous Next

Ella Mentry wrote on Nov 7, 2008 2:05 PM:

" Officials have only just begun to "go through the language of the measure," which could take weeks, but the average voter was expected to make a decision based on limited information? Yikes. "

Eman wrote on Nov 7, 2008 2:50 PM:

" It may take a few weeks but they'll iron it out just as they did in Oregon. As someone who's worked as a critical care nurse for over 15yrs and watched far too many good people die agonizingly slow, and painful deaths with no ability to change their course, I firmly believe this is power to the people. Most people don't understand how long hospitals can keep a body going on drugs and a ventilator...and insurance money... "

Mrs. Pellwerds wrote on Nov 7, 2008 5:15 PM:

" Eman: Thank you for your compassionate work and willingness to kill people who may be suffering. "

Thought wrote on Nov 7, 2008 6:47 PM:

" Re-Mrs>>
No one is going to kill anyone!!! Its an option each can make depending on their own wishes.. People like you in Oregon screamed wolf also and it has come to past that it is NOT abused!!! "

cheney119 wrote on Nov 7, 2008 6:59 PM:

" Issues like this is why people hate republicans and why your party will continue to decline. Bedroom issues, death bed issues, abortion, you people should stick to something you know something about, I don't know what that would be though. Remember the Schivo case? Blew up in your silly faces didn't it. Mind your own damn business you busybody republicans! Let folks decide what's best for themselves. "

viper wrote on Nov 8, 2008 8:31 AM:

" I agree with Cheney on this one it is your own choice who are you to decide how much pain and suffering I can go threw this is my body and it is my choice not yours
just like your down on abortion but yet not willing to pay for child care for abandoned children just a bunch of goody two shoes how would you like to be faceing death that will come in less then 6 months with No Hope to get better . and have someone tell you that you have to lay there in pain and agony
tell you die. yet you think think this is ok just to clear your mind and sole what a bunch of sick people who think someone has to lay there and suffer just to ease your mind and yet you claim to be god fearing people you should really take a good long look at what you have become I for one would be ashamed to know you ! and so would God if he were here this is no money out of your pocket let it be "

dogshead wrote on Nov 9, 2008 6:44 AM:

" Mrs Pellwards- have you not seen someone suffer through a horribly painful, terminal illness....every minute inescapable agony? We treat suffering pets better than we treat our loved ones. The option to leave this life as gracefully as possible should be offered by the medical profession. Thank you Voters of Washington! "

DestinyN wrote on Nov 9, 2008 11:01 AM:

" I am all for this law. That is all. "

berryjewels wrote on Nov 9, 2008 11:08 AM:

" I have been diagnosed with a terminal illness and though I voted on this I don't know that I will use it, however, I know it is there if I choose to do so!! My children are still fairly young as they are 21, 16 and 12 the last thing I want, is for them to remember me in such pain. If I can make it easier on all of us in the end and die with dignity then I am glad that I have that option and know there is no one who can stop it!! My children may all be grown before my time comes but no one ever really knows that now do they? I do not think that anyone has the right to tell others that they should have to suffer anguish until they die because you say that they should. Who do all you nay sayers think you are? "

Top Jobs
Top Garage Sales
Top Rentals