Story Photos
![]() Republican incumbent Rep. Ed Orcutt of Kalama, left, and Jonathan Fant, the Democratic challenger for the position two 18th district House seat.
|
Orcutt, Fant differ over merits of state income tax
Tuesday, October 7, 2008 7:30 PM PDT
By Barbara LaBoe
Does Washington need to consider an income tax?
Jonathan Fant, the Democratic challenger for the position two 18th district House seat says yes, though he admits it would be a hard sell in these financially precarious times. He said the current tax system places too much of a burden on the poor and isn’t a good way to budget or pay the state’s bills.
Fant’s Republican opponent, incumbent Rep. Ed Orcutt of Kalama, opposes such a move. Orcutt said previous studies have found income tax more volatile and that it could lead to increased local property taxes. And, given the $3.2 billion shortfall already looming in Olympia, Orcutt said the focus needs to be on reigning in spending, not changing the tax system.
Fant, of Battle Ground, stopped short of saying he wants to institute an income tax Monday afternoon. But he said the question does need to be studied by lawmakers and explained clearly to residents.
Creating a state income tax and lowering property taxes and the more regressive sales tax would be a fairer and more balanced way to raise the money the state needs to operate, Fant said. Currently, he said lower income residents have a tax burden of 16 to 18 percent because sales taxes and “sin taxes” on alcohol and tobacco tend to affect the poor more. Wealthy residents, he said, have a tax burden of 4 percent of their income.
“We can’t keep asking people with the least ability to pay to pay the most (percentage wise),” Fant said. “The goal isn’t more taxes, the goal is a fair and balanced tax system.”
He also said that Washington residents aren’t necessarily paying enough taxes overall to support all the programs and services they’ve come to expect from government. Nationally the state ranks in the middle for per capital spending and below several other Western states, Fant said.
“If we as a state want similar services as other Western states, then we’re not paying our bills,” he said.
Such a change may not be possible this session, still should be a long-term goal, Fant said.
Orcutt said the problem in Olympia isn’t revenues but spending.
“We’ve seen $8 billion in new spending in the past four years — that’s a 33 percent increase,” he said.
And, studies in other states have shown that if a state income tax was created and state property tax lowered, local governments would eventually increase local property and sales taxes to cover their own needs, he said. That, Orcutt, said would end up increasing everyone’s taxes.
Orcutt called for stricter, wiser budgeting and putting more money aside each year to anticipate downtowns.
Lucky7 wrote on Oct 7, 2008 7:58 AM:
Citizen Joe wrote on Oct 7, 2008 9:19 AM:
Viewpoint wrote on Oct 7, 2008 10:03 AM:
snow shark wrote on Oct 7, 2008 10:05 AM:
Lucky7 wrote on Oct 7, 2008 10:25 AM:
Lucky7 wrote on Oct 7, 2008 10:55 AM:
Rosey Glasses wrote on Oct 7, 2008 11:05 AM:
fanky wrote on Oct 7, 2008 12:28 PM:
American First wrote on Oct 7, 2008 3:18 PM:
DUH wrote on Oct 7, 2008 4:46 PM:
bizowner wrote on Oct 7, 2008 5:33 PM:
Viewpoint wrote on Oct 7, 2008 8:02 PM:
Rosey Glasses wrote on Oct 8, 2008 6:40 AM:







Printable version
E-mail this article

Past Month's Most Commented Stories