Hilander Bowl files for bankruptcy again
Monday, September 22, 2008 11:36 PM PDT
By Erik Olson
eolson@tdn.com
Kelso's Hilander Bowl is again fighting for its life, filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection to ward off a state attempt to collect $340,000 in back taxes, according to court documents.
The state recently tried to revoke a $100,000 bond Hilander owner Jim Springer put up in in March as a guarantee he would pay the delinquent taxes. The bond allowed Springer to reopen after the state shut the business down for five days.
Springer filed the petition for bankruptcy protection on Sept. 5.
It's the second time in two years the Hilander has filed for Chapter 11 in federal bankruptcy court. If granted, Chapter 11 bankruptcy allows businesses to remain open by keeping creditors at bay.
"It's part of the protections that will be keeping us viable as a business," Springer said Monday.
However, state revenue officials saw the move as an attempt to block their efforts to collect the taxes. Using unusually sharp language, a state attorney called for the court to reject Springer's bankruptcy request and leave the Hilander vulnerable to closure by the state.
"To call the case a fiasco would not be an exaggeration," Washington Assistant Attorney General Zachary Mosner wrote in a Sept. 16 motion.
The revocation of Springer's bond is on hold as long as the Hilander remains under bankruptcy protection. A hearing to dismiss the bankruptcy filing is scheduled for Nov. 5 in Tacoma, but it could come earlier, according to the state.
The Hilander first filed for bankruptcy in July of 2007 to protect itself from 52 creditors owed more than $5 million. A federal bankruptcy court judge revoked the bankruptcy protection in February, which led to the five-day closure of the business in March.
Since then, Springer has made progress on reducing the debt, according to court documents. The Hilander owes $1.75 million in debt to 45 creditors, according to court documents.
Sale by foreclosure of the Hilander¹s former home at 1509 Allen St. was a big part of clearing the debt, according to Springer.
However, the Hilander still owes more than $385,000 to the Department of Revenue. Springer said he has kept up on his payments, but he argued to the court that his bank impropertly took more than $45,000 from the Hilander¹s account to pay off old debt, according to court documents.
The Hilander also owes the state Employment Security Department about $160,000 and the state Department of Labor & Industries more than $63,000, according to Mosner, the assistant attorney general. The IRS is also owed about $640,000, dating back to the first bankruptcy filing, Mosner stated.
The state tries to work with businesses before shutting them down for falling behind on taxes, said Mike Gowrylow, spokesman for the Department of Revenue. However, if the payment plan isn't followed, the state must act to protect the taxes owed to the state, he said.
Springer said the state and federal government have not given him the time to put together a plan to get the Hilander back on its feet. Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection was the only option he had to prevent the Hilander from closing, which would hurt creditors, the 60 employees and the community as a whole, he said.
"Now, more than ever, we need community support to get through this bump in the road," Springer said.
eastereverywhere wrote on Sep 23, 2008 7:07 AM:
who am I? wrote on Sep 23, 2008 7:19 AM:
I hope they can make it work. as I said, I like the restaurant but he needs to pay his taxes...ALL of them. he shouldn't have let it get that far behind before he started working with the city to come up with a plan in the first place. (IMO). he waited until they came after him to try and pay the back stuff. "
Kelso Resident wrote on Sep 23, 2008 7:24 AM:
Jack Squat wrote on Sep 23, 2008 7:24 AM:
Beavis Carries a .45 wrote on Sep 23, 2008 7:39 AM:
lucky1 wrote on Sep 23, 2008 7:53 AM:
Lucky7 wrote on Sep 23, 2008 7:56 AM:
AmericanGirl wrote on Sep 23, 2008 8:04 AM:
castle rocker wrote on Sep 23, 2008 8:08 AM:
who am I? wrote on Sep 23, 2008 8:11 AM:
I think most of us would have been forced to deal with this issue a LONG time ago and if we couldn't we'd be done whether we wanted to be or not. "
ucrackmeup wrote on Sep 23, 2008 8:16 AM:
harley2404 wrote on Sep 23, 2008 8:27 AM:
Duck Fan wrote on Sep 23, 2008 8:47 AM:
country gal wrote on Sep 23, 2008 8:48 AM:
Pinky wrote on Sep 23, 2008 8:56 AM:
Mr. Bastinado wrote on Sep 23, 2008 9:06 AM:
justice4all wrote on Sep 23, 2008 9:10 AM:
DS wrote on Sep 23, 2008 9:10 AM:
JustMyOpinion wrote on Sep 23, 2008 9:15 AM:
jazzie wrote on Sep 23, 2008 9:41 AM:
arr0914 wrote on Sep 23, 2008 9:47 AM:
Kelso Resident wrote on Sep 23, 2008 10:01 AM:
cuz wrote on Sep 23, 2008 10:07 AM:
Old Bag wrote on Sep 23, 2008 10:20 AM:
1 kelso mom wrote on Sep 23, 2008 10:23 AM:
longview citizen wrote on Sep 23, 2008 10:39 AM:
tazer baby wrote on Sep 23, 2008 10:49 AM:
the Grateful Dad wrote on Sep 23, 2008 12:18 PM:
castle rocker wrote on Sep 23, 2008 12:44 PM:
DUH wrote on Sep 23, 2008 12:47 PM:
rastor wrote on Sep 23, 2008 1:26 PM:
lucky1 wrote on Sep 23, 2008 1:40 PM:
LongviewFam wrote on Sep 23, 2008 1:50 PM:
cheney119 wrote on Sep 23, 2008 2:15 PM:
Kelso Grandma wrote on Sep 23, 2008 2:24 PM:
ucrackmeup wrote on Sep 23, 2008 2:51 PM:
DS wrote on Sep 23, 2008 3:02 PM:
tazer baby wrote on Sep 23, 2008 3:05 PM:
skeezix wrote on Sep 23, 2008 3:23 PM:
country gal wrote on Sep 23, 2008 3:37 PM:
cooky wrote on Sep 23, 2008 4:00 PM:
Past Chinook wrote on Sep 23, 2008 4:22 PM:
who am I? wrote on Sep 23, 2008 5:46 PM:
I won't fault the government for expecting him to pay, and yes there are fines and fees for failing to do so. he SHOULD have worked with them LONG before they came after him. IF he had done that he wouldn't have as many fees, maybe.
I am sick of hearing "but there isn't anything else for our kids to do" bologna. my kids never go there and they find things to do without getting in trouble. I grew up here, there is just as much to do now then there was back then in the 80's. we didn't go out and get in trouble and then say it's not our fault because the city doesn't entertain us.
and I've lived in bigger cities too. guess what, after a short time we ended up doing EXACTLY the same things we did here in this little town most of the time. "
missymae wrote on Sep 23, 2008 6:58 PM:
FiscalConservative wrote on Sep 23, 2008 9:30 PM:
northender wrote on Sep 23, 2008 9:59 PM:
bozo wrote on Sep 23, 2008 10:12 PM:
yowza wrote on Sep 23, 2008 11:44 PM:
lolainlongview wrote on Sep 24, 2008 12:59 AM:
As for the Hilander, why does Jim think the community wants to support him now. Everyone gave him the second chance he begged for and he didn't make it work. This business is just not one that is going to survive. I haven't been there since the last time he was in trouble. I can handle a little over pricing but I will not be treated rudly by employees of any business and go back. Customer service is really lacking, but on the other hand if I was employed there I probably wouldn't be in such a great mood either, when you have no idea if the your job will be there the next day or not. GOODBYE Jim pay your taxes next time. "
press wrote on Sep 24, 2008 1:55 AM:
DS wrote on Sep 24, 2008 6:25 AM:
RealityCheck wrote on Sep 24, 2008 9:06 AM:
stargoddess wrote on Sep 24, 2008 9:29 AM:
For real. "
agreetodisagree wrote on Sep 24, 2008 10:14 AM:
tallsy wrote on Sep 24, 2008 12:37 PM:
SICKENED wrote on Sep 24, 2008 4:15 PM:
kelsomomof3 wrote on Sep 25, 2008 10:01 AM:
So that leaves me with not much to say. Other then Jim made his bed, so now he needs to be a man and lay in it. Bad business is bad business no matter how you try to sugar coat it. "
press wrote on Sep 30, 2008 3:06 AM:
grrrowl wrote on Oct 2, 2008 5:55 AM:
classic_mustang_chick wrote on Oct 2, 2008 1:02 PM:
ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!! "
lucky1 wrote on Oct 3, 2008 8:41 AM:
bowlingalleygirl wrote on Oct 6, 2008 3:22 AM:
I guarantee you that if Hilander closes, Jim Springer is not the only local business owner that will feel theperfectforaccomadtingoutoftownerneeds. "
stargoddess wrote on Oct 6, 2008 11:26 AM:
Obviously, he makes very bad business decisions, which is why he's in this mess ONCE AGAIN.
So, bowlingalleygirl, what you say is true, but don't blame anyone but Mr. Springer. "
bowlingalleygirl wrote on Oct 6, 2008 2:56 PM:
bowlingalleygirl wrote on Oct 6, 2008 3:19 PM:
bizowner wrote on Oct 6, 2008 9:58 PM:
classic_mustang_chick wrote on Oct 7, 2008 8:15 AM:
"I have been in the industry a very long time and i know what Im talking about." Well the rest of your post doesn't make me believe that you're 40...my guess is a very young adult that literally grew up in the bowling alley... "
LeeLee wrote on Oct 8, 2008 9:42 AM:
Music wrote on Oct 9, 2008 9:54 AM:
bowlingalleygirl wrote on Oct 10, 2008 1:03 PM:
bowlingalleygirl wrote on Oct 10, 2008 1:34 PM:
My main concern is that hilander remain open regardless if it stays in Jims hands or lands in someone elses. "
bowlingalleygirl wrote on Oct 10, 2008 1:46 PM:
longviewtransplant wrote on Oct 10, 2008 8:55 PM:






Printable version
E-mail this article

Past Month's Most Commented Stories