Gov. Palin says daughter is pregnant
Tuesday, September 2, 2008 5:28 AM PDT
By Liz Sidoti
The Associated Press
ST. PAUL, Minnesota — John McCain's running mate Sarah Palin said Monday that her 17-year-old unmarried daughter is five months pregnant, an announcement campaign aides said was aimed at rebutting Internet rumors that Palin's youngest son, born in April, was actually her daughter's.
A statement released by the campaign said that Bristol Palin will keep her baby and marry the child's father. Bristol Palin's baby is due in late December.
"Our beautiful daughter Bristol came to us with news that as parents we knew would make her grow up faster than we had ever planned. We're proud of Bristol's decision to have her baby and even prouder to become grandparents," Sarah and Todd Palin said in the brief statement.
The disclosure of the pregnancy came on the opening day of the Republican National Convention, scaled back because of Hurricane Gustav, and three days after McCain named Palin as his running mate. Other news was likely to overshadow the disclosure.
"Bristol and the young man she will marry are going to realize very quickly the difficulties of raising a child, which is why they will have the love and support of our entire family," they added. The father was identified in the statement as Levi, but the campaign said it was not disclosing his last name or age.
Sarah Palin's fifth child, a son named Trig, was born in April with Down syndrome. Internet bloggers have been suggesting that the child was actually born to Bristol Palin but that her mother, the 44-year-old Alaska governor, claimed to be the mother.
Palin spokesman Bill McAllister emphatically denied those rumors, and McCain adviser Mark Salter said the campaign announced the daughter's pregnancy to rebut them.
"Senator McCain's view is this is a private family matter. As parents, (the Palins) love their daughter unconditionally and are going to support their daughter," said McCain spokesman Steve Schmidt.
"Life happens," he said.
"An American family," added Salter.
The advisers said Palin told them about the pregnancy during lengthy discussions about her background. At several points during the discussions, McCain's team warned Palin that the scrutiny into her private life would be intense and that there was nothing she could do to prepare for it.
Prominent religious conservatives, many of whom have been lukewarm toward McCain's candidacy, predicted that Palin's daughter's pregnancy would not diminish conservative Christian enthusiasm over the vice presidential hopeful.
"I think it's a very private matter," said Roberta Combs, president of the Christian Coalition of America. "It's a matter that should stay in the family and they have to work through it together. My prayers go out to them."
Added Combs: "We're excited about the governor and think she's going to do well."
Mathew Staver, dean of Liberty University School of Law, said: "We're all sinners."
"We all make mistakes. Certainly, the ideal is not to get pregnant out of wedlock. But she made the right decision after her mistake," he said.
Staver also criticized anyone who would seek to make it a negative campaign issue: "It's absolutely shameful to put her child in the spotlight. She's not running for office. When someone can't face issues, they try to tear down a family."
justareader wrote on Sep 1, 2008 11:24 AM:
When there are NO more children in foster care or awaiting adoption, only then will I become pro-life, until then I will remain pro-choice and in favor of privacy for ALL. "
Lance Johnson wrote on Sep 1, 2008 11:26 AM:
cheney119 wrote on Sep 1, 2008 11:35 AM:
longviewrez wrote on Sep 1, 2008 11:45 AM:
Gondolapete wrote on Sep 1, 2008 11:57 AM:
justareader wrote on Sep 1, 2008 12:01 PM:
cheney119 wrote on Sep 1, 2008 12:08 PM:
DUH wrote on Sep 1, 2008 12:26 PM:
Tired of thinking of user names wrote on Sep 1, 2008 12:29 PM:
Atrucker wrote on Sep 1, 2008 12:32 PM:
Where do you get Obama's team out of this ? Or any party for that matter.
Or pro choice or life , none ya D!@#$ business really . But here you are shootin off your traps . I would be more concerned as to if this person can run the country if the need arises.
There is no question in my mind that Mr. Biden can do that. "
local yokel wrote on Sep 1, 2008 1:00 PM:
DW wrote on Sep 1, 2008 1:06 PM:
DW wrote on Sep 1, 2008 1:12 PM:
Diesel wrote on Sep 1, 2008 1:40 PM:
racingrocks wrote on Sep 1, 2008 1:41 PM:
jackie wrote on Sep 1, 2008 1:51 PM:
citizen wrote on Sep 1, 2008 2:05 PM:
she has more qualifications than obama. at least she has taken executive charge of a state. obama sits in the chambers if he ever attends and does nothing.
and yes...tdn certainly selects their choices of what comments to post and not...freedom of speech is not declared at tdn. it has to fit their liking before they post it. been the same way forever. "
jackie wrote on Sep 1, 2008 2:15 PM:
1209 wrote on Sep 1, 2008 2:28 PM:
roudy russ wrote on Sep 1, 2008 2:35 PM:
1209 wrote on Sep 1, 2008 2:50 PM:
mclovin it wrote on Sep 1, 2008 2:56 PM:
mary wrote on Sep 1, 2008 2:59 PM:
grrrowl wrote on Sep 1, 2008 3:41 PM:
starlite wrote on Sep 1, 2008 3:51 PM:
Lucky7 wrote on Sep 1, 2008 4:20 PM:
OddThomasfan wrote on Sep 1, 2008 4:48 PM:
Jinny wrote on Sep 1, 2008 4:57 PM:
This year I watched Obama's rise and was very interested in his answers to the problems in America.
I wanted what he had offered earlier. Change? yes, I wanted Change but I wanted "what kind of change?" answered.
He never did. I waited and waited. No specifics. His answers in Toledo, in Pennsylvania, in the West, everywhere he went was "we are going to invest (X)Billions in creating jobs right here in (X)city.
Always the answers are in taxing the upper 1%, the elite but I am left wondering as a voter how that does not also include me who cannot afford to keep being taxed for more programs.
What did I want? I wanted to hear Specifics on WHAT was going to be Cut. What programs that are now outdated can be cut. eliminated. I did not want to hear that we would be getting more government and more handouts.
So, along comes this person who has bucked the system. She has successes in putting folks out of office who have exploited our monies.
I want that portion of change. I want to see it happen in my lifetime.
All this other stuff, troopergate garbage, the pregnancy gossip, is not what I want to hear. I want to See a person from outside washington get in there and kick some butt.
Sarah Palin is a start in that direction.
Thankyou. "
LongviewFam wrote on Sep 1, 2008 5:11 PM:
racingrocks wrote on Sep 1, 2008 5:39 PM:
TDN Bad Boy wrote on Sep 1, 2008 5:53 PM:
longviewmom3 wrote on Sep 1, 2008 6:24 PM:
1209 wrote on Sep 1, 2008 6:37 PM:
1209 wrote on Sep 1, 2008 7:06 PM:
sosorry wrote on Sep 1, 2008 7:14 PM:
Diesel wrote on Sep 1, 2008 7:21 PM:
Gondolapete wrote on Sep 1, 2008 7:28 PM:
transplant wrote on Sep 1, 2008 8:00 PM:
justa_name wrote on Sep 1, 2008 8:11 PM:
mary wrote on Sep 1, 2008 8:22 PM:
LongviewRez wrote on Sep 1, 2008 9:12 PM:
LongviewRez wrote on Sep 1, 2008 9:15 PM:
Aconserve wrote on Sep 1, 2008 9:39 PM:
mom of four wrote on Sep 1, 2008 10:48 PM:
This Palin is a failure as a parent yet sets herself up as some moral authority, that's an issue if you ask me.
Parents cannot be there at every moment of everyday with their child, unlike you that is a frinking super parent and has the handbook you should really cut your comment back a few notches and say hey if this where my kid what would I do. I am sure she isn't over joyed that her 17 year old daughter is pregnant but she is going to deal with it. Also, if you could can you please find a publisher for your upcoming manual on "How to raise children" and guarentee your work. Just FYI I don't think eiher are cut out for the job~Presidents running and their VP's Hillary was an awful choice as well. "
local taxpayer wrote on Sep 2, 2008 4:53 AM:
hey now wrote on Sep 2, 2008 7:55 AM:
DUH wrote on Sep 2, 2008 8:24 AM:
mad monkeys wrote on Sep 2, 2008 9:10 AM:
RAL Alum wrote on Sep 2, 2008 9:29 AM:
DUH wrote on Sep 2, 2008 9:42 AM:
1209 wrote on Sep 2, 2008 9:49 AM:
hey now wrote on Sep 2, 2008 10:08 AM:
I am not trying to be holier then thou, but my argument is with her mother's policies, not with the girl. Palin advocates a policy of abstinence only education but cannot even get members of her family to follow that education. If a comprehensive education including the use of birth control measures was used, perhaps the pregnancy could have been avoided.
I am annoyed by conservatives who say that comprehensive sex education will encourage kids to have sex, they say telling them to use condoms is encouraging them to have sex. But with gun control they say safety classes and education reduce gun related issues and that its not the gun but the person that kills people (all of which I agree). Why isn't it the person choosing to have sex and not the condom told them to? "
LongviewFam wrote on Sep 2, 2008 10:12 AM:
red3953 wrote on Sep 2, 2008 11:05 AM:
1209 wrote on Sep 2, 2008 11:27 AM:
pilaf wrote on Sep 2, 2008 11:43 AM:
I would agree that it would be best if this were private, but the fact that Palin is a strong supporter of abstinence only education does make this a little bit relevant. "
TDN Bad Boy wrote on Sep 2, 2008 11:46 AM:
An observer wrote on Sep 2, 2008 11:52 AM:
Stella wrote on Sep 2, 2008 12:09 PM:
ulu wrote on Sep 2, 2008 12:30 PM:
greenbean wrote on Sep 2, 2008 12:34 PM:
Rosey Glasses wrote on Sep 2, 2008 12:42 PM:
1209 wrote on Sep 2, 2008 12:48 PM:
klb65 wrote on Sep 2, 2008 1:00 PM:
RAL Alum wrote on Sep 2, 2008 1:03 PM:
klb65 wrote on Sep 2, 2008 1:06 PM:
There are so many statements made in this comment section that are so far from the truth and made because of party affiliation and right wing vs left wing beliefs, it is pathetic. Check your facts, people! Go to Snopes.com and find the truth to all of the rumors circulating about Obama and give yourself a chance to read the truth and not just follow someone else's comments...think for yourself! "
DW wrote on Sep 2, 2008 1:25 PM:
Lucky7 wrote on Sep 2, 2008 1:38 PM:
TDN Bad Boy wrote on Sep 2, 2008 1:49 PM:
klb65 wrote on Sep 2, 2008 3:23 PM:
Cheney119 wrote on Sep 2, 2008 3:24 PM:
tdn bad boy wrote on Sep 2, 2008 3:40 PM:
Cheney119 wrote on Sep 2, 2008 3:41 PM:
1209 wrote on Sep 2, 2008 3:44 PM:
tdn bad boy wrote on Sep 2, 2008 3:57 PM:
DUH wrote on Sep 2, 2008 4:25 PM:
hey now wrote on Sep 2, 2008 4:31 PM:
DW wrote on Sep 2, 2008 4:54 PM:
cheney119 wrote on Sep 2, 2008 5:13 PM:
DUH wrote on Sep 2, 2008 5:19 PM:
cheney119 wrote on Sep 2, 2008 5:34 PM:
DUH wrote on Sep 2, 2008 5:51 PM:
1209 wrote on Sep 2, 2008 5:51 PM:
JD Hogg wrote on Sep 2, 2008 6:14 PM:
1209 wrote on Sep 2, 2008 6:14 PM:
Crystal wrote on Sep 2, 2008 6:15 PM:
1209 wrote on Sep 2, 2008 6:35 PM:
toledoone wrote on Sep 2, 2008 7:19 PM:
toledoone wrote on Sep 2, 2008 7:21 PM:
greenbean wrote on Sep 2, 2008 8:38 PM:
JD Hogg wrote on Sep 2, 2008 9:54 PM:
TDN Bad Boy wrote on Sep 2, 2008 10:06 PM:
1209 wrote on Sep 2, 2008 10:42 PM:
Duck wrote on Sep 3, 2008 1:24 AM:
finchica wrote on Sep 3, 2008 2:46 AM:
1209 wrote on Sep 3, 2008 6:25 AM:
dude wrote on Sep 3, 2008 6:38 AM:
castle rocker wrote on Sep 3, 2008 8:38 AM:
Stella wrote on Sep 3, 2008 9:18 AM:
I guess that was kind of sexist of me. I forget I have a single mother, small twon mind. Most of the politician types of this caliber are probably not very good parents as their job seems to be #1 in their life and they can afford to pay someone else to parent their children. They also don't have to do their own laundry, cooking, etc. so there is probably more quality time for children when they are home. "
DUH wrote on Sep 3, 2008 9:22 AM:
castle rocker wrote on Sep 3, 2008 10:29 AM:
Stella wrote on Sep 3, 2008 10:36 AM:
My step father got my sister pregnant when she was 14 yrs old, then punished her for it! Why should we expect her to have his baby? Her life is already messed up enough by his abuse. I was glad she could get an abortion. There's a good reason!What kind of life would that child have had? It probably would have come into this world with problems due to his constant beating of the mother. "
1209 wrote on Sep 3, 2008 11:10 AM:
castle rocker wrote on Sep 3, 2008 11:11 AM:
Stella wrote on Sep 3, 2008 11:53 AM:
duck wrote on Sep 3, 2008 12:09 PM:
1209 wrote on Sep 3, 2008 12:27 PM:
castle rocker wrote on Sep 3, 2008 12:41 PM:
TDN Bad Boy wrote on Sep 3, 2008 12:47 PM:
klb65 wrote on Sep 3, 2008 1:31 PM:
TDN Bad Boy wrote on Sep 3, 2008 2:23 PM:
Stella wrote on Sep 3, 2008 2:53 PM:
duck wrote on Sep 3, 2008 4:11 PM:
castle rocker wrote on Sep 3, 2008 5:33 PM:
dylan wrote on Sep 3, 2008 5:42 PM:
Rosey Glasses wrote on Sep 3, 2008 8:23 PM:
DW wrote on Sep 4, 2008 7:30 AM:
buggsie wrote on Sep 4, 2008 12:17 PM:
TwentySomething wrote on Sep 5, 2008 8:30 AM:
First off, it's absurd to attack her parenting skills, and the number of children she has! She has well-loved, well-behaved children, with excellent grades, one of whom made a poor choice w/ her boyfriend (one which probably would have been hidden had she been a "pro-choice" democrat). By your logic, every parent whose child makes a poor moral choice is unfit to parent and unfit for leadership. Absurd! "
TwentySomething wrote on Sep 5, 2008 8:36 AM:
TwentySomething wrote on Sep 5, 2008 9:08 AM:
If you change your wording from "want" to "would accept" then I'll raise my hand. I won't share the intimate details of my history w/ you, but I just want you to know that there ARE people out here who are willing to carry a baby to term regardless of how incredably difficult the situation might be. Which is the better choice: my anguish or a childs death, with so many people willing to adopt?
And in regards to the thinking that "if the baby would have genetic problems because of incest we should abort them", you should be very careful with that line of reasoning. The same standards could then be applied to to ALL unborn children with genetically-based disabilities (who by your thinking are not worthy of life), and then by extension to children outside the womb with disabilities. Judging someones right to live based on their ability or health is an ugly slippery slope that you DO NOT want to go down. "
roudy russ wrote on Sep 5, 2008 6:51 PM:
dispatcher wrote on Sep 6, 2008 11:57 AM:
berryjewels wrote on Sep 9, 2008 9:36 AM:






Printable version
E-mail this article

Past Month's Most Commented Stories