Wyden wants commission to delay LNG decision
Wednesday, August 6, 2008 4:06 PM PDT
By The Associated Press
PORTLAND — Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon wants federal energy regulators to delay a decision on a proposed liquefied natural gas terminal on the Columbia River.
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission appears ready to sign off on the terminal.
The commission has issued its final environmental review. State officials fear the agency may make up its mind without additional public notice or comment.
In a letter to the commission, Wyden called for a public meeting on the topic. Governor Ted Kulongoski has also asked for more time and called for the agency to redo its environmental analysis.
pinky wrote on Aug 6, 2008 10:02 AM:
Thoughtful wrote on Aug 6, 2008 10:02 AM:
gimpy wrote on Aug 6, 2008 11:56 AM:
DW wrote on Aug 6, 2008 12:52 PM:
thoughtful wrote on Aug 6, 2008 1:11 PM:
thoughtful wrote on Aug 6, 2008 1:27 PM:
You think making the US even more dependent on foreign sources of energy will change those figures and facts? The only LNG we should consider should domestic and from our own fields such as Alaska or the huge newly discovered gas fields in Louisiana.
by the way. NorthernStar is not a huge energy company. In fact, they aren't a small energy company. They don't even have the money to finish the development stage of their project let alone any money to build or pay for their $56 million salmon plan. Are you going to finance the construction of their plant? "
pinky wrote on Aug 6, 2008 1:35 PM:
nintendo pipeline wrote on Aug 6, 2008 2:09 PM:
grams wrote on Aug 6, 2008 2:13 PM:
As to Senator Wyden, I have stated before that he is a bulldog when he gets his teeth into something. But he also has only one vote. Lets not throw cold water on our representatives who have met with us, listened to us and shown respect for us as a constituency. Do you have any suggestions as to whom else we might turn to? Certainly not Deno Rossi. He doesn't seem to know that SW Washington exists either. As a conservative, I support any "NO LNG" legislator. "
grams wrote on Aug 6, 2008 2:21 PM:
gimpy wrote on Aug 6, 2008 8:04 PM:
Thoughtful wrote on Aug 7, 2008 7:37 AM:
pinky wrote on Aug 7, 2008 8:27 AM:
DW wrote on Aug 7, 2008 10:06 AM:
How would you know that the LNG will all come from over seas? And how is building a large LNG terminal here outsourcing? LNG is a very clean fuel. If companies that use LNG saw that we have a great source of it here, they may very well come here. Quit being such defetist. It really is o.k. to build stuff here. And as the salmon go, get the enviros out of the way and kill a few sea lions and preditory birds. That would go a long way into helping the salmon. I'll be happy to help with that for free. "
grams wrote on Aug 7, 2008 5:51 PM:






Printable version
E-mail this article

Past Month's Most Commented Stories