Full Forecaste

Home > Breaking News

Wolf pack confirmed in Oregon for first time in a century

Monday, July 21, 2008 6:33 PM PDT

By Jeff Barnard
The Associated Press

Font Size:

GRANTS PASS, Ore. — Oregon has its first wolf pack since the predator was wiped out by bounty hunting a century ago.

Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife wolf coordinator Russ Morgan heard at least two adults and two pups answer his howls under a bright moon in the pre-dawn hours Friday on the Umatilla National Forest in northern Union County.

“After searching and monitoring and surveying for two years, doing this — to actually confirm multiple wolves — was a bit of a surprise,” Morgan said from his office in La Grande. “We are talking about a very rare animal in the state of Oregon. That makes locating them difficult. It is satisfying to see part of that effort pay off.”

Morgan added that biologists would be keeping close watch over the wolves as part of Oregon’s plan for allowing them to roam free without causing undue harm to livestock.

Biologists have long expected that wolves would spread to Oregon after they were reintroduced to Central Idaho and Yellowstone National Park in 1995. The Idaho wolf population numbers more than 500, and young wolves leave the pack and strike out for new territories rather than overcrowd an old one.

To get to northeastern Oregon, they can swim the Snake River or walk across a bridge or dam. At least five wolves are known to have reached Oregon since 1999.

Wolves are protected by federal and state law, so it is illegal to shoot or trap them, even if they attack livestock.

The Bush administration had declared wolf reintroduction a success and taken wolves off the federal endangered species list, but a federal judge in Montana last week restored protection.

Oregon lists wolves as endangered, and has set a goal of four breeding pairs each in Eastern Oregon and Western Oregon.

The announcement triggered celebrations among conservation groups, who have been hoping to see wolves re-establish in Oregon to restore a balance of nature broken a century ago when a major predator was eliminated.

“Northeastern Oregon has plenty of big wild spaces left,” said Steve Pedery of Oregon Wild. “There is lots of good habitat there, a big prey base, a lot of places to roam and not come into conflict with people.

“We’re going to make sure the legal protections are in place so there are not temptations for poachers to go out and break the law.”

Oregon Cattlemen’s Association President Bill Moore, who ranches in Baker County, said he knew of no confirmed wolf kills of livestock in Oregon, but expects they will come.

The Oregon wolf management plan does not allow ranchers to kill wolves they see threatening their herds, but Moore said the association is working to change that.

Morgan said the pack answered his howls in the same area where several single sets of wolf tracks were spotted in the snow last winter.

He said the pups had distinctly higher-pitched howls than the adults, and he could make out at least four different voices, though there could have been more.

Previous

Rosey Glasses wrote on Jul 21, 2008 4:16 PM:

" AWESOME! Wolves are wonderful creatures to watch in wild. I only hope our wildlife people can get good pictures of our new family! This is good to hear about and maybe it will keep some of the other wildlife that is over-populating in check in the future as the group becomes a larger pack. (watch your small pets). "

fossagrimmin wrote on Jul 21, 2008 4:46 PM:

" two adults and two cubs doese consitute a pack...lol "

bullslug wrote on Jul 21, 2008 4:47 PM:

" Its about time, maybe now we can start to thin out the Elk and Deer herds. "

Mr. Chinook wrote on Jul 21, 2008 6:42 PM:

" Wolves have destroyed elk and deer populations in Idaho. The only good wolf is a dead wolf. Period! "

columbian wrote on Jul 21, 2008 7:48 PM:

" THIN OUT THE DEER AND ELK HEARDS?LET ME KNOW WHERE IN EASTERN OREGON THE HEARDS NEED THINNED OUT.AND WHY WE ONLY GET TAGS EVER 3 YEARS.WOLFS,SEALS,SEA LIONS.HOPE I SEE ONE WHEN HUNTING. "

WsuCoug wrote on Jul 21, 2008 10:05 PM:

" would you really shoot a wolf? If so you are sick...How many of them have you seen in the wild? Its not like they are destroying the deer and elk populations. I for one believe that a balanced ecosystem is a great thing the world needs predators to thin out the week, and besides this area is natural habitat for wolves. Unlike sea lions who need to be taken care of when they are way up the Columbia.

Oh and turn the caps off... "

Girth VonPhister wrote on Jul 21, 2008 10:32 PM:

" I love it!!! I wondered how long it would take the tobacco chewing, romeo wearing rednecks to pipe up. It took exactly 32 seconds for Mr. Chinook and columbian to display their ignorance. Wolves are no more responsible for declining elk and deer herds than is the man in the moon. Your ridiculous comments only shows how little you really know about the subject. It's your attitudes, beliefs and threats to the wildlife that is forcing the courts to keep these animals on the endangered species list. You really are doing the wolf lovers a great service by displaying your lack of knowledge on the subject. "

columbian wrote on Jul 21, 2008 11:00 PM:

" Can anyone tell me why we need more predators?Just one good reason.With road kill,mankind,and the predators we aready have we dont need anymore. "

Rubicon wrote on Jul 21, 2008 11:07 PM:

" The wolf is a wonderful animal. I love them. "

Mr. Chinook wrote on Jul 22, 2008 1:33 AM:

" I killed close to 100 (lost count) wolves when I lived in Alaska. It's the only animal that you don't need a tag or liscense to kill. They ( Alaska Fish & Game )just want 'em shot because they do so much damage to moose and sheep populations. Now I suppose you tree-huggers will try to say that you know more about wildlife management than the state of Alaska. Heck, we even hunted them with airplanes and shot them from the air...anything to get rid of them. The only good wolf is a dead wolf. And before you tell me to go back to Alaska, I do go back....and I shoot every wolf I see when I am there. "

luke the drifter wrote on Jul 22, 2008 9:17 AM:

" I don't have a problem with wolves existing in the wild. They were here long before we civilized this area and the deer and elk populations were way better than they are now.

So I don't buy the idea of the wolves destroying wildlife populations. I have hunted for several years in the Middle Fork of the Salmon wilderness in Idaho. There are more and more wolves there now than have been in the last 100 years. There are also many more elk than have been there lately.

With Mr Chinook's logic, there would be no elk or deer. We average seeing over 50 deer a day while hunting, and several elk herds. Bighorn sheep are also a common place.

The game biologists who stopped at our airstrip said at first the deer and elk didn't know what to expect from the wolves and the wolves did significant damage. But it didn't take long for the deer, elk, and other animals to understand the danger of wolves.

I also think that wolves should be treated just like any other game animal, and tags should be given out if a population gets to a certain level.

Predators help keep the herds strong. They weed out the old and sick. We are the ultimate predator and we do the same. "

columbian wrote on Jul 22, 2008 10:05 AM:

" WsuCoug:Little red riding hood what was she worried about?WOLFS ARE SOMEONE WITH THERE CAPS ON. "

cadillaccreepin' wrote on Jul 22, 2008 11:36 AM:

" i wanna see some bears "

Top Jobs
Top Garage Sales
Top Rentals