Story Photos
![]() Trains blast their horns for safety reasons when approaching Kelso's two public crossings, but nearby residents are pleading for silence. Roger Werth / The Daily News
|
Kelso considering options for railroad 'quiet zone'
Wednesday, July 16, 2008 11:37 PM PDT
By Amy M.E. Fischer
Even without his hearing aid, South Kelso resident Howard Monroe can hear the train horns just fine. In fact, the noise is enough to drive Monroe, 83, into the house when he’s outside chopping wood or remodeling the garage.
Monroe, a former soldier who’s suffered from post-traumatic stress since he was held prisoner by the Germans in World War II, said he’s been complaining to Kelso city officials about the train horns for years.
If anything, the noise problem has gotten worse, he said. Burlington Northern Santa Fe runs an average of 60 trains through Kelso in a 24-hour period, according to BNSF spokesman Gus Melonas.
“I’ve counted five or six horns in a mere 10 minutes. They blast ‘em — they don’t blow their horns. They’ve got a lead foot and just blast and blast,” said Monroe, who lives in the 900 block of South Fourth Avenue. “They’ll start blowing down on Maple Street and do almost a continuous blast down past Yew Street. It just drives me up the wall.”
Now, in response to citizens’ complaints, the City Council has asked city staff to explore how to make Kelso a train “quiet zone.”
“We’re just trying to make it as livable and as nice as possible, but we won’t sacrifice safety,” City Manager Paul Brachvogel said Monday.
The Federal Railroad Administration issued a “Train Horn Rule” in 2005, requiring locomotives to blow horns for 15 to 20 seconds before entering a public crossing. Previously, each state set its own laws regarding train horns.
Under the Train Horn Rule, local jurisdictions may create a quiet zone by showing that the lack of a horn does not pose a significant safety risk. Quiet zones also require upgraded crossing signals or installation of a stationary wayside whistle at the crossing, which would still blow but would affect a smaller area than a moving train’s horn.
A crossing signal upgrade would require full crossing arms on both sides of the tracks that motorists can’t drive around. The crossing arms would be activated by automatic sensors on the tracks.
According to Kelso Community Development Director Mike Kerins, the city now has single-arm crossings, and only one of the three tracks activates them. Upgrading Kelso’s two crossings at Yew and Mill streets is challenging because the tracks are on the dike, and the approaches aren’t flat and straight, he said.
Kerins expects to get cost estimates for both options later this week, and then the City Council can decide whether quiet zones are worth pursuing with the railroad company, he said.
The process also involves coordinating with several agencies to ensure a quiet zone is suitable for Kelso, where four people have been fatally hit by trains in the last 10 years.
“It may be that the solution is not going to fit within our budget. We don’t know,” Brachvogel said.
Kelso residents aren’t the only ones bothered by the train horns. Kyle Sawyer, who lives across the river off Westside Highway, says the horns wake him up at night, even though he closes the windows. He’s called Kelso and Cowlitz County officials to complain, but no one’s called him back, said Sawyer, 45.
He and his wife can’t afford to move, “so we’re basically stuck,” Sawyer said Wednesday.
Longview resident John VanDerWerff is so frustrated by the horns, he sent a letter to county commissioners and to Olympia legislators.
“They all ignored it. ... I guess the Washingtonians are used to that blasting of the horns in the middle of the night,” said VanDerWerff, 68, who moved from the San Francisco Bay Area to Nevada Drive in 2005. “The first year, it wasn’t bad at all. In fact, it sounded kind of cute. You’re in the country, you hear a whistle blow in the distance.”
Now, he said, “My wife and I, we’re ready to move out. ... I think it’s ridiculous. At night they go berserko, they lay on these horns at one o’clock, two o’clock, three o’clock. ... It’s outrageous.”
Kelso Gringo wrote on Jul 17, 2008 12:01 AM:
columbian wrote on Jul 17, 2008 12:30 AM:
beachbum wrote on Jul 17, 2008 1:56 AM:
Woodchuck wrote on Jul 17, 2008 6:20 AM:
Zucchini wrote on Jul 17, 2008 6:47 AM:
nimby wrote on Jul 17, 2008 7:30 AM:
KelsoLesbian wrote on Jul 17, 2008 7:33 AM:
concerned wrote on Jul 17, 2008 7:37 AM:
imlovinit wrote on Jul 17, 2008 7:48 AM:
Beavis Carries a .45 wrote on Jul 17, 2008 7:54 AM:
skeezix wrote on Jul 17, 2008 8:28 AM:
Former Resident wrote on Jul 17, 2008 8:32 AM:
really wrote on Jul 17, 2008 8:34 AM:
Nunesy wrote on Jul 17, 2008 8:50 AM:
skeezix wrote on Jul 17, 2008 8:53 AM:
reasonable1 wrote on Jul 17, 2008 9:07 AM:
Presumably, everyone using the Interent to complain here also has access to search tools that would explain to them what conductors are required BY LAW to do to warn of their approaching a level crossing.
I once considered renting an apartment less than a block from a train crossing. I asked another renter if trains bothered her. Trains? Shed never noticed them, so I thought maybe the line wasnt used. After moving in, I learned it was, indeed, quite active. It didnt take me long to get used to the sound and to recognize patterns (day/night, etc.) of how different conductors chose to implement the requirements. The only inconvenience I felt was that if I was on the phone, I had to stop talking during the whistle. I was also within a mile of an international airport close enough to count the windows on landing aircraft. That, too, is something we can get used to if we choose to. I loved the apartment. I came to love the ambient noises even to set my watch by the trains or determine wind direction by aircrafts landing and takeoff patterns.
I commend Kelso for doing its homework and researching ways to reduce unnecessary noise, but as many others here have said, safety must come first, and so (IMO) no train whistle is unnecessary. "
reasonable1 wrote on Jul 17, 2008 9:11 AM:
http://www.fra.dot.gov/downloads/PubAffairs/TRAIN_HORN_RULE_FactSheet.pdf "
Beer&Skittles wrote on Jul 17, 2008 9:13 AM:
Rural Citizen wrote on Jul 17, 2008 9:14 AM:
Common_Sense wrote on Jul 17, 2008 9:28 AM:
If it was before, then yes, I understand this must be annoying; however if it was after then I am sorry, but you really have no right to complain. After all, I assume you bought / rented your property at a reduced rate because of the close proximity to the train lines.
As for blowing the horn, I am sure that if the train only blew its horn once and went to to hit someone or something these same people would be up in arms about the train drivers not caring about anyone's safety.
Some people just are not happy unless they are complaining about something. "
Common_Sense wrote on Jul 17, 2008 9:30 AM:
gimpy wrote on Jul 17, 2008 9:58 AM:
reasonable1 wrote on Jul 17, 2008 10:19 AM:
Tortoise wrote on Jul 17, 2008 10:35 AM:
skeezix wrote on Jul 17, 2008 11:00 AM:
Wow...pontification? That's an awfully big word. How long have you been waiting to get that into your daily lexicon. Let me clarify for my own self here and leave Former Resident the opportunity to chime in, if he or she chooses. For myself, my comments were not intended to make people think I was superior in any way to anyone. They were merely observations of what I see on many posts here and elsewhere. There are individuals who make posts that seem to just be complaints about anything and everything that comes along. Quite frankly, some of them have no merit. Seriously now, if you live near airports or train tracks, the odds are pretty high you will hear planes and trains. They make noise, everyone knows that and should take those things into consideration. I don't live near the Portland Airport, but on some days, depending on wind direction, the flight path goes over my house. I'm not writing to congress to make them stop. I don't live near a railroad, but on some nights, I can hear locomotives idling and whistles blowing. Neither am I writing to the city of Portland to have them put a stop to it. Lighten up. "
Common_Sense wrote on Jul 17, 2008 11:02 AM:
It's like people who move on to busy streets or who's houses back on to highways or interstates - they continually complain about traffic and noise.
If the train whistles bother you - move.
I personally live close to a railroad track - we knew this when we bought our house and the train whistles blow quite a lot. Personally I would rather have train whistles blow than a train hit a car or person attempting to cross the tracks. "
rosy wrote on Jul 17, 2008 11:14 AM:
Quiet zone sounds good. Good sleep and peace of mind? Priceless. "
Master Wario wrote on Jul 17, 2008 11:56 AM:
beachbum wrote on Jul 17, 2008 12:24 PM:
retrobeth wrote on Jul 17, 2008 12:48 PM:
Cheney119 wrote on Jul 17, 2008 1:25 PM:
Scot Heisel, TDN wrote on Jul 17, 2008 2:30 PM:
Rocko wrote on Jul 17, 2008 2:36 PM:
Former Res wrote on Jul 17, 2008 3:03 PM:
Former Resident wrote on Jul 17, 2008 3:15 PM:
Guess what, I wasn't trying to imply I was better than anyone else. I merely don't think people who CHOOSE to live within earshot of loud noises (suches as railways, airports,highways, etc.) have any room to complain about the associated noise. I happen to rent right off a fairly major highway, and yet I don't complain about the road noise...it doesn't bother me. If those type of noises bother people living nearby, there's a simple solution - they can move! "
bn rail wrote on Jul 17, 2008 3:40 PM:
For all those home owners near the tracks, understand this the rails were there many years before your home was either purchased or even built. I too live near an area in the country that has this dilema. We adjust. But as a society we are so selfish and self serving that anything bothers us and we don't think of others just ourselves.
We all are governed by the lackluster political system and they set the rules and it takes time for change. Sometimes too long for some.
How bout this we prefer all the crossings to be closed off so we don't have to deal with these self serving, impatient sue happy people out there. That would eliminate the numerous grade crossing accidents we go thru each year and would solve the horn issue for us all.
PETITION your city councils and upper government on that issue.
give me a break. "
Gondolapete wrote on Jul 17, 2008 4:25 PM:
Buford McGee wrote on Jul 17, 2008 4:35 PM:
momto1 wrote on Jul 17, 2008 5:11 PM:
roudy russ wrote on Jul 17, 2008 5:27 PM:
Atrucker wrote on Jul 17, 2008 5:52 PM:
Smelt would come in then commercial boats roaring up the river at night full tilt .
Rocky point was a switch hard more so than today, BANG < BANG , all day long .
Oh, when they built the hall of justice
had a pile driver in my back yard , try that some time .
I have been around the trains for years ,I think they need the horns ,I darn near bought it once at a crossing near the mouth of the Cowlitz , for what ever reason I did not see that big train. "
DUH wrote on Jul 17, 2008 6:28 PM:
Commenter wrote on Jul 17, 2008 6:42 PM:
Gondolapete wrote on Jul 17, 2008 7:18 PM:
There is not one example I bet that you can prove trains blow their horns for 30 seconds...count out 30 seconds...You are making that up!!!! "
mustang wrote on Jul 17, 2008 7:24 PM:
greenbean wrote on Jul 17, 2008 8:00 PM:
bn rail wrote on Jul 17, 2008 9:07 PM:
the speed for most trains thru kelso is 40 mph so it's a 3 second delay before we start to blow for the crossing and no it's not 30 seconds, with the long, long, short and final long sequence thru the crossing it is roughly 15 seconds..
and the crew is required by law night or day to blow. It may seem like a long time, but there are several areas that have mutiple crossings so we have to do the sequence more than once....
education people, education.... "
concerned wrote on Jul 18, 2008 6:20 AM:
ugh...yeah wrote on Jul 18, 2008 9:30 AM:
DUH wrote on Jul 18, 2008 11:12 AM:
classic_mustang_chick wrote on Jul 19, 2008 11:23 AM:
If the noise bothers you plant some trees, sound moves in waves, as the trees grow the sound waves getting through to you will be reduced and you get a quieter space. "
KelsoLesbian wrote on Jul 20, 2008 3:13 AM:
I appreciate the education, thank you. You have answered a few questions I have had for years already. We notice different types of trains and different companies seem to have different horn regiments. We can almost name the train by length and frequency of the horn blasts. (yes, we understand the doppler principle effects some of this.) Are there different regulations depending on speed, mass, and use of the train? "
Rosey Glasses wrote on Jul 20, 2008 4:48 PM:
mhmltn wrote on Jul 21, 2008 6:24 AM:
tugtrio wrote on Jul 22, 2008 8:55 AM:
Common_Sense wrote on Jul 22, 2008 1:52 PM:
grrrowl wrote on Jul 24, 2008 4:49 AM:
bluE wrote on Jul 25, 2008 3:59 PM:
dw wrote on Jul 26, 2008 5:33 PM:
I could not imagine what those train operators have to put up with, not to mention a bunch of whinners who choose to live by a train track. "
lindaj wrote on Jul 28, 2008 2:39 AM:
finchica wrote on Aug 3, 2008 3:04 PM:
The Grateful Dad wrote on Aug 3, 2008 11:48 PM:







Printable version
E-mail this article
Past Month's Most Commented Stories