Full Forecaste

Home > Area News

Colf family proposes splitting Martin Island with Corps of Engineers

Wednesday, July 2, 2008 11:44 PM PDT

By Erik Olson

Font Size:

The Colf family has offered nearly one-third of Martin Island outside Woodland to be used as mitigation for the Columbia River channel-deepening project in an attempt to avoid a forced sale by lower river ports.

The family would swap 143 acres on the northern tip of the island in exchange for 73 acres of the Chumbley property, located in the Woodland Bottoms, according to a news release from the Colfs. The family would make other smaller parcels of Martin Island and nearby Burke Island available for mitigation, or compensation, for the environmental damage caused by deepening the channel to a depth of 43 feet between the mouth of the Columbia River and Portland.

The family would also keep a 32-acre lagoon on the island used by boaters, according to the release.

The $150-million channel deepening project is a partnership among the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, two Oregon ports and the ports of Vancouver, Woodland, Kalama and Longview.

This latest proposal — the fourth by the family over the last decade — would require the ports and the Corps to tweak their plan to obtain mitigation land, said Roy Heikkala, a spokesman for the family. The Colfs purchased the island in 1999.

“It may be a little inconvenient for them but the last nine years has also been inconvenient for the Colf family. Our proposal will reduce the Colf’s contribution of land needed for mitigation from 70 percent to 43 percent for the entire project,” Heikkala said in a written statement.

The Colfs do not oppose the channel deepening plan, Heikkala said. This plan would allow them to continue farming Martin Island and the Chumbley property, he said.

Dianne Perry, project manager for the sponsoring ports, said it’s too soon to tell if this latest offer will be enough.

“We’re still trying to determine if it meets the mitigation requirements,” Perry said.

If no agreement can be reached before Sept. 15, the ports may vote to force the Colf family to sell the 447-acre island by eminent domain, which is the power to take private property for public use.

Previous Next

feistyone wrote on Jul 3, 2008 4:22 AM:

" While I too believe we need to deepen the channel, I am dead set against eminent domain. It is sad when they can take private property for public use. Of course you will have people agree with it until it affects them. "

towboater wrote on Jul 3, 2008 6:49 AM:

" IMO, Portland T-6 is a virtual culdesac compared to the potential to convert this Woodland area into a world class Seaport.
20 miles less dredging.
6 hrs closer.
Continue to use T-6 for bulk cargo.

I dont understand why the FWS Wildlife refuge on Batchelor Island does not qualify? What about Deer Island or Sand Island near Goble? Goat Isl?
Hayden Isl? Government Isl? Sauvies Isl?
Why Martin Isl?

On Sept 15, basically, the Port of Portland is going to try to exclude Woodland/Kalama/Longview/St Helens Port regions from any possibility of joining forces to create a Seaport and adjacent bridge in this Woodland area. What reasons do these Ports have to support this? How many "bones" did the Port of Portland toss to them?

Does it sound like I am not a big fan of the Port of Portland? Please, where is the drydock now? Portland spends all this money on Port Docks and Green ways while they still have a 2 lane freeway and continue to dump raw sewage into the river. You folks going to the Music Fest downtown, just look across beneath the Morrison is a

Building a race car track or Casino or Stadium here is peanuts compared.

Mitigate.
Settle.
Open your eyes USACE, FWS & Port Commisioners...look a hundred years down the road. The only one who profits from this is the Port of Portland. Dont close the door on our childrens future. "

mole wrote on Jul 3, 2008 9:51 AM:

" This bullying to get the island is not to build a port, there but for enviromental trade, to build else where.I have not read about any plans for a terminal,on the island.I would like to know.towboater do you know what plans they have?A terminal would be great there,port of portland has more money not only because of more people,the airport is part of the ports income also. "

Kelso Alum wrote on Jul 3, 2008 11:32 AM:

" Having talked with Richard Colf over the course of the past two years, it sounded to me like the Corp of Engineers wanted his land for a wetlands area. As the Colfs have not barred indigenous wildlife from inhabiting Martin's Island, I'm not sure why the Corps even needs it at all. The Colfs have been more than generous and reasonable with people who want to take their land just "because they can". I have not seen any of the governments or ports along the river seeking a mutually beneficial agreement with the Colfs at any point in this proceeding. These people deserve to either be compensated appropriately for their sacrifice or left alone to use the land as they have been doing for many years. "

mole wrote on Jul 3, 2008 2:35 PM:

" kelso alum,just as I suspected,I owned property next to a wetlands[willow grove]why not let the colfs keep that,because it looks like a wetlands already,the colfs have no plans to build,a giant mall or speedway, just own it and farm.THE PORTS NEED TO HAVE OWNERSHIP SO THEY CAN SAY WE HAVE THIS MUCH WETLANDS SET ASIDE SO WE CAN BUILD SOMEWHERE ELSE,A SWAP TO THE ENVIROMENTALISTS SO THEY CAN COVER UP A SWAMP ELSEWHERE. "

Top Jobs
Top Garage Sales
Top Rentals