Story Photos
![]() Geana and Jim Stutz of Kelso and their two children, Jes, 5, and Makia, 4, stand in front of their car. After being scammed for $4,100, they had to put the car up for collateral on a loan to repay their credit union. Greg Ebersole / The Daily News
|
Convincing letter from 'research' firm part of elaborate scam
Wednesday, June 18, 2008 11:13 PM PDT
By Leslie Slape
A slick multimillion-dollar “Mystery Shopper” scam swindled a Kelso couple out of $4,100, and the victims want to warn others.
Geana Stutz, 33, said on June 10, she received a convincing letter from “Frontline Consumer Research Corp.” saying she had been hired to do consumer research. Enclosed was a realistic-looking check for $3,600 to cover her assignment.
“They have you put that in your bank account and do your assignment,” Stutz said. “They tell you to spend $200 at Wal-Mart, J.C. Penney, Home Depot or lodging at Best Western or Days Inn. Then you take $2,950 and MoneyGram it to whoever’s name they decide to give you. They’re getting money on a counterfeit check and you get stuck with the bill.”
She and her husband, Jim, looked over the check carefully before depositing it. It had a bar code and a watermark, which reassured them.
“Everything checked out,” she said. “The first thing I did, I called the number of the man who’s supposed to be my coordinator. They act completely professional. They send you an evaluation sheet to send in with your report.”
The scam is a variant of the Nigerian advance fee (419) fraud, according to several Internet sites.
Stutz didn’t get wise to the scam until her second assignment, when her coordinator asked her to pay $500 out of her own pocket for insurance, and then asked her for $400 more. She said she didn’t have the money and asked if the company had a Web site. The man said no.
“I went to my bank and asked, ‘Can you check on this?’ I was starting to panic,” she said. “They told me the bank is real, the routing number is real, but the check is fake.”
Stutz provided a copy of the check, which is drawn on the New York branch of a Canadian bank and includes the name of a company in Ontario, Canada.
“Luckily, Fibre (Credit Union) knew it wasn’t a matter of us trying to steal from them,” Stutz said. “Unfortunately, they had to turn the amount into a loan and I had to put up my car for collateral.”
Jim Stutz, 43, has been unemployed since his company, Wastecorp, shut down March 28, and they have two disabled children.
“We were able to pull enough to make our house payment, but now ... what are we gonna do?” Geana Stutz asked.
“We just don’t want to see anybody else get hurt,” she said. “Everybody’s grasping for straws because of the economy.”
She reported it to the Cowlitz County Sheriff’s Office, the Federal Trade Commission and the police in Montreal, Canada.
Longview woman escapes similar scam
In May, Charlene Loudin of Longview got a similar mystery shopper letter and a $3,950 check from “InfoLinks Survey Co.”
“The check looks real,” she said. “I bet the bank would fall for it. It’s even got a water spot on it. It’s colored. It’s got enough digits for a bank account. It’s all printed professionally, it’s got “original document” on the back, it’s got the signature part. It looks exactly like a real check.”
Loudin, 35, who is unemployed, almost fell for it.
“For the first few minutes I was like, ‘What!? That’s a lot of money.”
The letter asked her to shop at “the exact same companies you would work for in any big city,” Loudin said.
But the former accountant took a closer look and saw some telltale tipoffs.
“The screw-ups are in the addresses, where normally people don’t look,” she said. “Had I not dealt with paperwork before, I would have fell for this.”
For example, the company name was typed as INFOLINKS SURVEY Co., but a real company would not use all capitals and suddenly change to a word using lowercase letters, she said.
Also, the application has a dotted line for the applicant to sign, but real companies use a solid line, she said.
Police told her to toss it in the garbage, she said.
Tips to avoid being trapped
A legitimate mystery shopping company does not charge an application fee, according to the Federal Trade Commission.
The FTC advises potential shoppers to visit the Mystery Shopping Providers Association (MSPA) Web site at www.mysteryshop.org
The FTC says consumers should be skeptical of mystery shopping promoters who:
• Advertise in newspaper classifieds or by e-mail. While it may appear as if these companies are hiring mystery shoppers, it’s much more likely that they’re pitching unnecessary — and possibly bogus — mystery shopping “services.”
• Sell “certification.”
• Guarantee a job as a mystery shopper.
• Charge a fee for access to mystery shopping opportunities.
• Sell directories of companies that provide mystery shoppers.
If you think you have encountered a mystery shopping scam, file a complaint with your local consumer protection agency, the Better Business Bureau, your State Attorney General, or the FTC (ftc.gov).
For more information, visit these Web sites:
http://www.secretshopper.com/info/shoppers/ScamAlert.asp
http://www.snopes.com/fraud/employment/shopper.asp
http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/alerts/mysteryalrt.shtm
Kelso Gringo wrote on Jun 17, 2008 11:51 PM:
Absolutist wrote on Jun 18, 2008 12:56 AM:
Mrs. Pellwerds wrote on Jun 18, 2008 8:31 AM:
Beer&Skittles wrote on Jun 18, 2008 8:42 AM:
Proud Mama wrote on Jun 18, 2008 8:59 AM:
Someone Who Cares wrote on Jun 18, 2008 9:01 AM:
Scot Heisel, TDN wrote on Jun 18, 2008 9:06 AM:
bigdar wrote on Jun 18, 2008 9:15 AM:
mom of 2 wrote on Jun 18, 2008 9:24 AM:
Beer&Skittles wrote on Jun 18, 2008 9:35 AM:
CONCERENED wrote on Jun 18, 2008 9:42 AM:
greenbean wrote on Jun 18, 2008 10:01 AM:
Kem Cho wrote on Jun 18, 2008 10:06 AM:
Louie wrote on Jun 18, 2008 10:45 AM:
It just doesn't happen people so shred those letters. Only a sactioned lottery like Washington, Oregon or other states where you buy a ticket and take a chance are legit. "
l-town mom wrote on Jun 18, 2008 11:08 AM:
stargoddess wrote on Jun 18, 2008 11:28 AM:
Gondolapete wrote on Jun 18, 2008 11:31 AM:
citizen_jane wrote on Jun 18, 2008 11:33 AM:
Mrs. Pellwerds wrote on Jun 18, 2008 11:43 AM:
El Gabilon wrote on Jun 18, 2008 11:44 AM:
Louie wrote on Jun 18, 2008 11:49 AM:
cu employee wrote on Jun 18, 2008 12:19 PM:
Kalama Dude wrote on Jun 18, 2008 12:44 PM:
writegirl wrote on Jun 18, 2008 1:40 PM:
citizen_jane wrote on Jun 18, 2008 2:47 PM:
SPARROW wrote on Jun 18, 2008 2:50 PM:
DRUMMER GIRL wrote on Jun 18, 2008 3:07 PM:
Louie wrote on Jun 18, 2008 4:44 PM:
With so much publicity by all the media on these scam issues I would think people wouldn't fall prey to them...guess I better think again! "
Blogger Jogger wrote on Jun 18, 2008 6:08 PM:
Piper wrote on Jun 18, 2008 11:05 PM:
Leslie Slape wrote on Jun 19, 2008 8:32 AM:
Beer&Skittles wrote on Jun 19, 2008 12:31 PM:
Common_Sense wrote on Jun 19, 2008 1:47 PM:
I appreciate these people coming forward to tell their story, however for people to stand back and say "It wasn't our fault, we were scammed" I just don't buy into it.
What I want to know is why they didn't wait for a reasonable amount of time before buying their moneygram? Do you not normally wait a few days when you receive a check to ensure the funds are in the bank account where the check was issued?
I agree with the people above who said 'if it looks like it's too good to be true, chances are it is'. "
jimmys_girl wrote on Jun 19, 2008 4:35 PM:
We did not come foward to place blame on anyone or for sympathy from anyone, the bank didnt even know it was counterfeit. I went to them and questioned it when I became concerned about the validity and they didnt even know yet. I called the bank that the check was from myself and gave them the numbers and found that it was counterfeit and told the credit union myself. I did not know If I was going to be in trouble with the law even though I didnt know that it was countefeit until after the fact. When I walked into that bank I was crying and shaking and asing for help, not knowing what to expect, but I went to them first. There was no greed involved, would someone that was greedy go on their own and question a bank about something that may or may not come back on them and possibly put them in jail??? I did this to try to help provide food, pay bills etc. so my family might be able to servive while my husband and I try to find local work. Yes I do think the credit union needs to have a better way of checking incoming checks being deposited. This was an isolated event not something that happened everyday in our account. "
jimmys_girl wrote on Jun 19, 2008 4:44 PM:
jimmys_girl wrote on Jun 28, 2008 4:20 AM:








Printable version
E-mail this article
Past Month's Most Commented Stories