48°F
Cloudy
Full Forecaste

Home > Area News

Fibre to pay $175,000 in discrimination suit settlement

Tuesday, June 3, 2008 11:22 PM PDT

By Erik Olson
The Daily News

Font Size:

Longview Fibre Paper and Packaging Co. has agreed to pay $175,000 to settle a discrimination suit filed on behalf of a disabled Kelso worker, who said the company withdrew a job offer after learning of his spinal injury and need for pain medication.

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission announced the settlement on behalf of Scott Harshbarger Tuesday morning. The EEOC had filed suit on Harshbarger behalf in September.

The alleged Americans with Disabilities Act violation took place in the fall of 2006, about six months before Fibre was sold to the Canadian firm Brookfield Management Associates. Under terms of the settlement, Fibre does not admit any wrongdoing.

Harshbarger’s spinal injury, which he suffered while working in a shipyard in 1990, required him to take a daily methadone dose to control pain but did not otherwise affect his ability to do the engineering aide job the company found him qualified for in September 2006, according to the EEOC.

Harshbarger, 45, who now works as a self-employed contractor refurbishing homes, said the settlement bars him from commenting on the case and referred questions to EEOC attorneys.

Frank McShane, Fibre’s chief operations officer, could not be reached for comment Tuesday.

Fibre officials rescinded a job offer a month after making it after learning Harshbarger was taking prescription methadone, a powerful narcotic commonly used for pain medication, said Lisa Cox, trial attorney for the EEOC.

“You can’t just screen out people like that. You need to do an individual assessment,” Cox said.

After his injury, Harshbarger underwent four surgeries to fuse the vertebrae in his spine, Cox said. “The pain is probably going to be with him forever and probably going to get worse.”

In addition to paying the $175,000 to Harshbarger, Fibre is required to review its discrimination policies, train employees about prohibited discrimination and voluntarily provide information to the EEOC concerning its handling of discrimination complaints for two years, according to the commission.

By federal law, the maximum settlement for a discrimination claim is $300,000, Cox said. The $175,000 settlement is significant because an agreement on such a high amount was reached so quickly, she said.

In November, the state Supreme Court ruled against Fibre in a similar case involving discrimination against a potential job hire. In a 9-0 decision, the court ruled that Fibre officials illegally denied Stacy Hegwine of Kelso a job as a clerk and order checker because she was pregnant, overturning a 2005 decision by Cowlitz County Superior Court Judge Stephen Warning.

Previous Next

Reality Check wrote on Jun 3, 2008 5:41 PM:

" Sooooo.....
Does he get the job? "

devils advocate wrote on Jun 3, 2008 6:54 PM:

" $175k is probably cheaper in the long run than having an opiate using engineer "

the dude wrote on Jun 3, 2008 8:10 PM:

" Discriminate against what? Fibre bans opiate drug use among other banned substances. The fact that the employee disclosed that he was a druggie should have been the only reason to not be offered the job.

I hope Mr. Harshberger gets the job. I'm sure that the employees left down there are happy to have him. "

UW Squirrels wrote on Jun 3, 2008 11:22 PM:

" Harshbarger is probably lucky he didn't get the job. The way Fibre is clearing house now, he probably wouldn't have it now anyways, so at $175,000 he's come out on top compared to what he would've made before they let him go. "

Justaguy wrote on Jun 4, 2008 8:02 AM:

" I think he came out pretty well. The Company knew his condition when they hired him. UW Squirrels is right, he probably would not of made it through the cuts that are now taking place. After paying his Layer, he might have gotten $100,000. I am no longer with Fibre and after all the years I worked for the company, I only received about $7,000 in severence pay. I think he did pretty well. "

thinkin' wrote on Jun 4, 2008 9:33 AM:

" I don't understand this thinking. Years ago, injured and also on morphine, the state wanted me to go back to work. Where I thought I was maybe okay to do so, my employer was forced to face the issue of having a 'loaded' employee using heavy equipment. Is that a loaded gun, or what? It was my spouse who said, "hold the horses here!" No one is safe in this scenario. As long as there's no safety issue and the person is actually able to perform the job. As one having been on morphine, I truly question their ability to do any job to the level of another who's not on pain meds. "

zenith wrote on Jun 23, 2008 5:18 PM:

" "Druggie"???? This man is taking methadone for PAIN, not for addiction problems! Attitudes like this are why we need lawsuits like this. People on long term opioid therapy are tolerant to the effects of their medication and are able to function, work, drive normally, all studies show. "

November 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30

›› Today's Events
›› Submit An Event

View All Events

Top Jobs
Top Garage Sales
Top Rentals