Full Forecaste

Story Photos

Bjorn Hedges, White Creek wind farm general manager, kneeling, and wind tech Tim Clever take in a spectacular view 265 feet in the air atop a wind turbine. Bill Wagner / The Daily News

Home > Top Story

Cowlitz PUD considering expansion at White Creek wind farm

Tuesday, May 20, 2008 11:39 PM PDT

By Erik Olson

Font Size:

ROOSEVELT, Wash. — Atop a 265-foot wind turbine, workers can see 50 miles across the rolling plains overlooking the Columbia River Gorge. Four mountains — Hood, Jefferson, Adams and St. Helens — cut majestic swaths in the skyline. And the tiny cattle grazing below look out of place amid the 89 titanic turbines that make up Cowlitz PUD’s $360 million White Creek wind farm.

“It definitely gives you an unobstructed, panoramic view of the area,” said White Creek general manager and Castle Rock native Bjorn Hedges.

The 205-megawatt project, which can power 38,000 homes, went online in November following more than a year of construction. About 30 employees now work there, and they make the 280-step climb a few times a week up each tower and inside the turbine to the top hatch, called the nacelle, to monitor the conversion of wind energy into electricity, Hedges said.

It’s renewable energy blowing through the 9,500-acre site in rural Klickitat County, 21 miles east of Goldendale, and it’s the wave of the future. The PUD will soon be required by a 2006 state voter-approved law to use more renewable power, and expansion to more wind power could be down the road.

In July, PUD commissioners expect to decide whether to move forward with 40 additional wind turbines or go back to the drawing board to find more power.

“We will need additional renewables,” said Cowlitz PUD spokesman Dave Andrew.

From the ground, the three 150-foot-long blades on each turbine appear to rotate slowly, as if gently pushing a giant battleship through water.

But up high in the nacelle, where the turbine’s wind energy is converted into electricity, the blades seem to move more quickly, like propellers of a single-engine plane. They complete 16 revolutions per minute, but the tip of the blade can reach speeds as high as 156 mph, according to Hedges.

It’s that kind of power that Cowlitz PUD must harness to meet its renewable energy standards mandated by voter-approved Initiative 937. By 2012, 3 percent of the PUD’s power load must come from renewable resources, which include wind, solar and geo-thermal power. The threshold jumps to 9 percent in 2016 and 15 percent by 2020.

About 6 percent of the PUD’s power now comes from renewables, thanks to its purchase of 46 percent of White Creek’s output. Three other public utilities — Klickitat PUD, Lakeview Light & Power and Tanner Electric Co-op — buy the rest of the wind farm’s output.

The project is owned by a private investment group that to advantage of a federal tax credit designed to help promote wind energy. The four utilities have the option to buy the project after 10 years.

White Creek wind energy costs about $50 per megawatt-hour. That’s higher than the $32 rate the Bonneville Power Administration charges the PUD for hydropower, but the federal energy expects it will no longer be able to meet its power load demand in 2011, which would likely drive power costs up.

The PUD’s share of the energy is being sold as surplus to pay for electrical system upgrades until the renewable energy standards take effect, Andrew said.

But the PUD still needs to find more renewable energy to meet the increases in state standards for 2016 and 2020. The utility’s three commissioners are considering the Harvest Wind project, a 40-turbine expansion in the same area that could generate an additional 100 megawatts of power.

So far, the Eugene Water and Electrical in Oregon and the Lakewood-based Lakeview Light and Power have expressed interest in partnering with Cowlitz PUD, Andrew said.

The Harvest Wind price tag, however, is unknown. Construction costs rose 38 percent from when the PUD began planning White Creek in 2003, and they show no sign of going down. PUD commissioners expect to see an estimate this summer, and a decision will come later, Andrew said.

“We’ve got to make sure the cost is right,” he said.

Kelso Hilander wrote on May 21, 2008 1:19 AM:

" I like this kind of power production. I think it is neat. "

feistyone wrote on May 21, 2008 4:34 AM:

" A good solution. I don't know why we weren't doing this long ago. I think anywhere the wind blows,they should be putting up wind turbines. The demand for more power will increase steadily over the years. "

Kelso wrote on May 21, 2008 8:44 AM:

" Nuclear is the way to go. Wind is very inefficient. "

UW Squirrels wrote on May 21, 2008 9:02 AM:

" While I am also for nuclear, you have to keep in mind that its efficiency is on par with wind's if you're going to call wind inefficient. Some Googling yielded nuclear efficiencies of around 35%, and I know from a paper I did a few weeks ago that wind turbines are around 30% depending on the conditions. "

Billy Hill wrote on May 21, 2008 11:32 AM:

" They sure have ruined the beauty of the Gorge. From Hood River to Hermiston thats all your eyes are drawn to. "

gimpy wrote on May 21, 2008 1:18 PM:

" I think these things look like an art installation. I drive through hundreds of them when I go to eastern Oregon and marvel at this technology. And it is a win/win situation: the farmers are growing wheat right up to the windmills. "

squirrel wrote on May 21, 2008 2:11 PM:

" I think it's pretty cool too. 25 years ago it's all you could see in the Tehachapi Mtns in CA too. It's a fascinating site. There are vast miles of land just sitting there. What a contribution. Nuclear still has that one little problem: the waste. We still can't deal with the waste. Makes it off my list altogether for that alone. It'll be interesting to see what happens with the new forms of ocean hydro energy too. "

kalama kow wrote on May 21, 2008 2:42 PM:

" UW Squirrels and Kelso are correct about the efficiency of nuclear and wind. This may come as a surprise, but the Federal Hydroelectric dams are about the same. The actual energy output of a hydro project, when averaged over a year, is about 35% of the nameplate rating on all the generators in the powerhouse. The beauty of nuclear or hydro is the source of energy can be dispatched as the regions load swings up and down. With wind of course you get it when the wind blows. The worst months for wind are our County's highest energy demand months (Jan and Feb). The best months for wind are also the high water flow months. Therefore it makes sense to couple the swings of the wind energy output with the storage capacity of hydro. BPA does that for Cowlitz PUD using the Federal Hydro system.They call it Wind Integration or Shaping. When the region still has excess energy we sell it to the Californians who pay market prices, currently much higher than wind or hydro. Its a great deal for keeping the lid on rates here.Its tantamount to selling wind to the Californians who, as we all know, already have an excess of hot air. "

bluE wrote on May 21, 2008 4:04 PM:

" they should buy a whole bunch more, but americans seriously need to slow down on the consumption though, and i am not just referring to electricity. "

Mr.Grim wrote on May 21, 2008 9:15 PM:

" I've said it before, and it bears repeating... There are only two ways to create process heat - by burning fossil fuels and by using nuclear power. "Process heat" is needed to manufacture countless things which we all take for granted. Nuclear power creates zero greenhouse gas emissions, unlike fossil fuels, and I truly believe that nuclear power is the wave of the future. Nuclear waste is an issue, sure, but there is technology available (which other countries are using) that recycles waste and creates new fuel from that waste. During his presidency, President Carter decided, in his infinite wisdom, to outlaw that technology in the name of national security. What we need is a comprehensive nuclear policy in this country which allows us to use available technology to wean ourselves off of the foreign oil teat. I'm in no way badmouthing alternative energy sources like wind, geothermal and solar; they are great sources of green energy - they just aren't enough to sustain our way of life. The green energy that will save the world is right in front of us. Nuclear is the only way to go. Oh, and while we're on the energy kick, I'm all for partial dam removal on the Columbia and Snake Rivers sometime before the salmon are gone forever. You never know, that might solve the Sea Lion problem as well. "

Stella wrote on May 22, 2008 1:00 PM:

" Don't wait for PUD to come up with solutions. Solar panels are now designed to work from light and not just sunlight for our cloudy NW skies. Invest in solar energy. "

Top Jobs
Top Garage Sales
Top Rentals