Meetings show many opposed to casino
Thursday, April 17, 2008 8:01 AM PDT
By Thacher Schmid
The majority of more than 400 people who attended public hearings on Clark County's efforts to reach a new agreement with the Cowlitz Indian Tribe were opposed to the tribe's $510 million casino development near La Center, the county's top official said Tuesday.
A tribal spokesman and a leader of a casino opposition group each characterized the hearings as positive. The three events took place April 7 in La Center, April 10 in Battle Ground and Tuesday in Vancouver. More than 200 attended the La Center meeting alone, said county policy analyst Troy Rayburn.
Betty Sue Morris, chairwoman of the board of commissioners, said commissioners will meet with county lawyers to determine their next move. She said lawyers would likely renegotiate certain provisions of the 2004 agreement that was thrown out by a state hearings board, largely because the county did not include enough public participation.
"I think that the majority of the testimony throughout the three (hearings) opposed the casino, and they opposed the casino for moral reasons," Morris said. "Some for transportation reasons, some for environmental reasons, but we heard, repeatedly, moral reasons like gambling and gambling addiction, we heard a lot of that."
Last week Clark County commissioners passed a resolution opposing gambling — which did not name the Cowlitz Indian tribe or its proposed casino, now under review in Washington, D.C. The county is appealing the overturning of its 2004 contract with the tribe, even as it considers a new contract with the tribe.
Morris said she sees no contradiction between that resolution and a new county-tribe agreement. Clark County has long opposed gambling by any group, she said, and the county-tribe agreement is broader than just gambling.
"Suppose they come in with a water park like the one in Thurston County, what good does the (tribe's) gaming ordinance do us then," Morris asked. "The (agreement) applies to any development that goes in there."
"The opposition has purposely confused the two, that the (agreement) relates to gambling, and that the (agreement) enables gambling, and that's not the case."
In January, the tribe passed an "irrevocable" tribal ordinance intended to replace the now-invalid agreement, which dealt with transportation, building codes, law enforcement and safety issues.
"We're willing to discuss issues on a government-to-government basis, we're open to discussion," said Phil Harju, the tribe's spokesman for casino issues. Harju said it was "very gratifying" to see large numbers of casino supporters and union members who came out to support the tribe's proposed development.
Tom Hunt said his opposition group Citizens Against Reservation Shopping counted 71 percent of speakers against the casino.
"These were just folks coming to give their suggestions, and the suggestions were two: One, thanks for opposing the casino, and two, please do not negotiate a new (agreement)," Hunt said.
The tribe's agreement with Clark County was its only agreement with a local government. La Center, Vancouver and Woodland have passed resolutions opposing the casino.
news 2 wrote on Apr 17, 2008 7:53 AM:
I support it too wrote on Apr 17, 2008 8:08 AM:
Best Use wrote on Apr 17, 2008 8:11 AM:
Tex from Cougar wrote on Apr 17, 2008 9:07 AM:
Jackie wrote on Apr 17, 2008 10:02 AM:
It's here already wrote on Apr 17, 2008 10:08 AM:
Less than one percent of the county is on record as opposing the casino. Best Use has it right.
this is shaping up to be the biggest victory for the Native Americans since the Little Big Horn and just as Custer had it coming so do Clark Co. CARS, Woodland and LaCenter. "
Jackie wrote on Apr 17, 2008 10:28 AM:
Call Cowlitz Indian Tribe at 577-8140, Ask for someone involved the casino project. Tell them to come to Cowlitz County.
Kelso city Mayor's: 423-1719.
Longview City Mayor: 422-5000.
Contact Cowlitz County commissioners: 577-3020.
Kelso/Longview Chamber of Commerce at 423.8400
You will likely hear reasons for not doing it like the money already spent, But stick with it. Persistence will pay off. Keep calling. Print these phone numbers off and tell your friends and have them call. Can you imagine what that many jobs would do for our community? "
Real Hoopa wrote on Apr 17, 2008 10:39 AM:
Wash-Vegas wrote on Apr 17, 2008 10:47 AM:
wb wrote on Apr 17, 2008 1:01 PM:
Friend of the Cowlitz wrote on Apr 17, 2008 1:07 PM:
Hoopa wrote on Apr 17, 2008 1:37 PM:
Internets wrote on Apr 17, 2008 3:07 PM:
"No ones ancestors "have been here" since the beginning of mankind."
"Everyones ancestors lived in the Garden of Eden, or Alduvi Gorge..."
How many fallacies are you going to use? "
El Gabilon wrote on Apr 17, 2008 4:36 PM:
Sick of TEX wrote on Apr 17, 2008 4:50 PM:
re Sick of TEX wrote on Apr 17, 2008 5:56 PM:
magnetized wrote on Apr 17, 2008 6:27 PM:
Ben Dover wrote on Apr 17, 2008 10:10 PM:
why???????/ wrote on Apr 18, 2008 5:32 AM:
TOM THE MAN wrote on Apr 18, 2008 8:21 AM:
The land parcel doesn't even belong to the Cowlitz tribe - it's owned by Mr. Barnett along with the Mohegan tribe form back east. You get the picture here?? It's not about the good of the Cowlitz, it's about big bucks for Barnett and Company. The tribe thing is just a race card so he can make it happen for him. Sure, a token amount of dollars will be thrown to the tribe as fodder, just to make it look good. But check out the percentage of revenue that will go to the Mohegans for their financial help. Won't even stay here in Washington. "
Jack Mehoff wrote on Apr 18, 2008 9:11 AM:







Printable version
E-mail this article

Past Month's Most Commented Stories