Full Forecaste

Home > Editorial

Trade will help keep state solvent

Tuesday, February 26, 2008 5:30 AM PST

Font Size:

Washington business leaders and economists have been saying since the first of the year that the state is relatively well-positioned to weather the national economic slowdown, thanks to its heavy reliance on international trade. News Monday from the annual meeting of the National Governors Association in the nation's capital appeared to bear out their optimistic outlook.

The national economic downturn already has contributed to at least 18 states sliding deep into the red, prompting governors meeting in Washington, D.C., to appeal to President Bush Monday for another economic stimulus package. Washington's economy, though slowing, remains among the most robust in the nation, with state economists projecting a budget surplus of about $954 million.

Trade with China, Japan, South Korea, Canada and Mexico has more than offset the impact of the housing slowdown on Washington jobs and state coffers. State exports hit a record of more than $66 billion in 2007, according the state Department of Community Trade and Economic Development. That's an increase of $13 billion, or 25 percent, over total exports in 2006.

If there is a dark cloud on the trade horizon, it's a growing protectionist sentiment that threatens to slam the door on virtually all new international trade agreements. An important, market-opening trade pact negotiated with South Korea more than a year ago has been stalled in Congress for many months.

The "fast track" trade negotiating authority expired last spring, and congressional leaders have indicated that they will not renew it. Under this authority, Congress can only accept of reject trade agreements without amendment. Absent fast-track authority, there is little prospect of forging significant new trade agreements.

Presidential hopefuls Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama this week are sounding as though they would have little need of such negotiating authority. The two Democratic candidates are trying to outdo one another with their anti-free trade rhetoric this week in Ohio. They're focusing their fire on the North American Free Trade Agreement that many in Ohio blame for the loss of manufacturing jobs.

Such scapegoating for the difficulties many face in the inevitable transition to a global economy apparently plays well in today's political climate. That has troubling implications for the national economy. It's especially troubling with regard to this state's economic future.

Washington is the nation's most trade-dependent state. The state exports more on a per capita basis than any other state. One in three jobs in the state is supported by trade. International trade largely determines this Washington's economic well-being.

Write your elected representatives now and, when it comes time to vote in the fall, this is one hot-button that Washingtonians should consider when casting their vote.

grams wrote on Feb 26, 2008 11:31 AM:

" " Washington is the nation's most trade-dependant State" And along with the international trade agreement issue is the other which asks the question--- what will happen to our part of the lower Columbia Basin if the Columbia River is not consistantly and predictibly available at all times for those foreign ships which come in to all our Columbia River's Washington and Oregon Ports? Any one have any answers? LNG is not one of them. "

Hauskapoika wrote on Feb 26, 2008 6:05 PM:

" Of course there is growing sentiment for protectionism. What proponents of "free trade" don't ever mention is the number of jobs lost to manufacturing overseas. While trade may help, it would have been much better if the jobs had not been lost in the first place, and if trade was fair and equal. California has the busiest ports in the Americas, and yes, there are exports, but they are tiny compared to the imports - and, of course, California has a huge budget deficit. The only reason things aren't worse is the weak dollar. When the dollar rises in comparative value, exports are going to fall, and then we'll have a triple whammy - loss of jobs, loss of exports, and even higheer oil prices. Even the paper and sawmills would close tomorrow if there was a lumber supply overseas that matched the Pacific Northwest. "

grams wrote on Feb 26, 2008 8:31 PM:

" Hauskapoika
That is really scary! It is always a follow the money thing isn't it! Your statement is very thought provoking. We lose jobs to manufacturing over seas and we lose jobs here because of an importation of foreign fossil fuel. Good Grief! "

Top Jobs
Top Garage Sales
Top Rentals