Longview Weather
79°F
Severe
Full Forecaste

Home > Area News

Four days remain to comment on casino

Tuesday, August 22, 2006 10:22 AM PDT

By Michael Andersen

Font Size:

With four days left for the public to comment on the Cowlitz Indian tribe's application for a reservation and casino, tribal spokesman David Barnett said there is "no chance" that anti-casino forces will overturn the process.

"It's a federal process," Barnett said. "The processes have all been laid out by Congress."

The extended comment period on the tribe's 135,000-square-foot casino complex ends Friday, Aug. 25.

The law requires the Bureau of Indian Affairs to assess the effect of a casino on its surroundings. The BIA will base its assessment in part on public comments.

A corporation co-owned by Barnett and the Mohegan Tribe own the proposed reservation site, along Interstate 5 near La Center. Barnett's father, John, chairs the tribal council.

[Correction: a previous version of this paragraph said that Barnett's family owned the site. The family transferred its option to the corporation before the sale.]

The comment period has been extended twice, first to 90 days, then to 135, both times at the request of U.S. Rep. Brian Baird, D-Vancouver.

Baird spokeswoman Meghan O'Shaughnessy said Monday that Baird sought the latest extension after "dozens" of phone calls from constituents.

"We're trying to keep the process as open as possible," she said.

Barnett called the second extension "delay tactics by the opposition."

Any comments will be published along with the final environmental impact statement, which is funded by the tribe for federal review.

"We're in the process of writing a final EIS," Gerold Henrikson, who is handling public comments on the Cowlitz application for the Bureau of Indian Affairs. "That will take several months."

"I think it's just sit around and wait until the end of the year," said Barnett.

Barnett and tribal leaders say a casino would give the tribe, federally recognized in 2000, a homeland and enough income to offer services such as health care to its members.

Foes say the project will increase crime and gambling addiction and threaten other local businesses.

"How do you compete," Woodland Chamber of Commerce member Darlene Johnson told The Daily News in June, "if when you go [to the casino], you get free meals? How do you compete with the hotel they're going to build if it's going to be subsidized by not having to pay the taxes that we pay?"

Several casino opponents did not return calls for comment Monday.

For descriptions of the $510 million project, see the tribe's site at www.cowlitzcasino.com/ and an opposition group's site, www.nothereplease.com/.

To comment, write Henrickson at the Bureau of Indian Affairs, 911 NE 11th Ave., Portland, OR 97232.

Previous Next

free spirit wrote on Feb 7, 2008 1:19 AM:

" If they were in bad condition , it would seam that the neighbor who saw them in the woods would have immediately rescued them, and asked questions later. Obviously they were not in bad condition, only crates(not a crime) or carriers. Maybe he did take his animals with him on a trip. I have taken mine before,and know many people who take thiers along(even in RVs. Sounds like extreme tree huggers to me. Or maybe the PETA people who think a dog should never be crated.I guess it is more humane to go to dog shows and let other peoples dogs out in protest to them bieng in thier crates. I guess if this results in them getting hit by a car, lost, or running at large , this is acceptable. Most vet's require that an animal is crated in the waiting area. I hear no mention of whether or not they had food, or water. I think the humane society also must have someting better to do than chase after a guy and 18 dogs that are not in unsavory condition, even by the accounts of the neighbor who saw them in the woods. If they were in bad condition shame on that neighbor for leaving them there. "

Top Jobs
Top Garage Sales
Top Rentals